Which one is better among traditional learning and learning from your own experience for high school or colleges?
Whether learning from your own experience or traditional learning is better has been the epicenter of discussion in multiple forums and a conclusive unanimous agreement is yet to be achieved. Different distinguished individuals have expressed their views both in favor and against the very idea of traditional learning and learning from your own experience through multiple modes of communication be it a main stream media or be it the social media. Below in essay of mine I will try to enunciate that learning from your own experience can be more beneficial for the child.
The most prominent reason is that people remember those things which they do it with their own interest. Moreover, when child likes to do painting then he will do it with full of his/her attention. In addition, child gets more knowledge if they want to learn something with their own dedication and interest.
Continuing to this student learn many things in their daily lives. For instance, if child is not able to climb on the ladder then he/she will try to do it and they will be able to climb one day. Furthermore, pupils feel pressure while studying traditional subjects because sometimes they feel it’s too boring. If they experience something in their life related to the subject then they will learn it faster.
While on the other hand, there are people who will still continue to wrangling about the facts or traditional learning and learning by own experience. I would like to conclude that students can learn faster and better with their own experience rather than traditional learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...metimes they feel it's too boring. If they experience something in their life...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03802281369 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7256974295 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543726235741 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4335168613 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365123649653 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145769412384 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104113959911 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224592407923 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126045513103 0.0609392437508 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.