Women can do everything that men can and they even do it better. they also can do many things that men cannot. But there is a fact that their work is not appreciated as men's although they have to sacrifice a lot for their family, and career. So someone said: " A woman's place is in the home. What do you think?
Recently, the phenomenon of women can do everything that men can and they even do it better and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that women also can do many things that men cannot, but there is a fact that their work is not appreciated as men's can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, women also have to sacrifice a lot for their family and career, so a woman's place is in the home can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the woman's place is in the home when they sacrifice for their family and career, as they do things much better than the men might increase the consequences of critical issues. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues.
To conclude, I profoundly believe that the benefits of doing work more better than the men may impacts on the woman's place in the home while they sacrifice a lot for their family and career far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...believe that the benefits of doing work more better than the men may impacts on the womans ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12671232877 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95265663064 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7130160807 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.7 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.9669160288 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541494581347 0.242375264174 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187814923071 0.0925447433944 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169218211896 0.071462118173 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307190673045 0.151781067708 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147389031043 0.0609392437508 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.