Workers and nurses should be paid more. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of beneficial ramifications of paying higher salaries to nurses have sparked a heated debate. There are many compelling arguments for both sides. I am inclined to believe, that nurses should get paid more compared to other professions, and I will anayse the potential justfications for my argument.
From general standpoint, nursing is another profession out of so many other occupations. Most of the people argue, that all jobs should be recognised in the same level to reduce discremination in the world. As an example, nurses are getting paid to their role, at the same time, accountants and lawyers also do a job, but they never complain about low salaries or low recognition. Thus, it is required to analyse this further, to determine if it is really required.
In contrast, eventhough, people argue all jobs should be treated the same way, as humans, we have to anayse the role of each job. As an example, the responsibility of an Accountant is to do the books and help an organisation. If an accountant does a mistake, the company always can rectify it by paying a fine or by tolerating the loss. However, the situation is completely different in humanity subjects such as doctors and nurses. Most specially, they cannot do any mistakes at all, as it can costs a life. Hence, compared to other industries, people in these industries have a huge burden on their shoulder.
To conclude, eventhogh there are lots of compelling arguments for both sides, it is apparent that, nurses do a huge service to the world which should not have a monetary value. Therefore, they should compensate appropraitely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cost'
Suggestion: cost
...annot do any mistakes at all, as it can costs a life. Hence, compared to other indust...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00366300366 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99606382591 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1552897385 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0666666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160235168198 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478403092935 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539778731746 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105511509653 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432700164521 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.