The world's governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing
problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution.
Recently, the phenomenon of the world's enormous issues has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " which is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that the government should remain liable for environmental pollution. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, the earth pollution is bound up inextricably with threatening our planet, which indicates they lead to both global warming and climate change. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between endangered species and over-fishing in oceans as well as an exponential increase in deforestations. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of air pollution is correlated positively with not only greenhouse gases but also fossil fuels.
Within the realm of ecology, without the slightest doubt, natural catastrophes attribute to finite resources, in that it would come down to lack of foods, erosions, and famine. A salient example of such attribution is rainforests, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take deserts for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint rare animals problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to devastating effects, urbanization, and even the water pollution. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of governments regulations in saving the environment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that using green energy is the pragmatic solution. Meanwhile, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74832214765 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2654386383 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701342281879 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4965667409 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196940464345 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499795353286 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899587704681 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11502279272 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108236099091 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.