young blood can be way more effective and productive compared to aged people
It is universally accepted that young blood can be way more effective and productive compared to aged people. Today, it can be observed that the large proportion of some countries is youngsters compared to the ones who are retired. This essay will discuss the merits of having more young adults and the demerits of having old adults in a country.
To commence with the advantages, it is needless to say that people aging 20 to 40 years old are independent and also most likely to be having a high physical and mental strength, hence they usually work hard in order to fulfill their family’s essential needs. This does not only assist themselves but also aids the government in terms of being financially stable as they are likely to be paying taxes from their source of income. One prominent example can be the United States of America, about 65% of their population is young and pay the taxes from their regular earnings which leads the government to be financially strong, resulting as a superpower on planet earth.
Conversely, while it is often argued that older people are without any doubt the most experienced in a family, it is certain that their contribution with money to aid a family’s monthly expenses is likely to be zero. However, their consumption rate of food and other utilities are similar to other family members. This is not just a burden on the youngsters of a family but also a problem for the government because they have to pay a monthly stipend as a pension to these old people. For instance, a family will definitely have to struggle in fulfilling their needs if they had fewer youngsters than the older ones owing to their consumption rate which will be significantly high compared to their earnings.
Taking everything into consideration, it appears to me that a large number of young blood in a country is an absolute imperative that is entirely justified with the benefits they are providing by giving their blood and sweat in order to pay taxes which makes government stabilized despite the experience of old adults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to consideration, it appears to me that a large number of young blood in a country is an absolute...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.5418719212 237% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 352.0 242.827586207 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83806818182 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71659694361 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.5024630542 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9058526464 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.818181818 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.9669160288 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282708129314 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129582845842 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192486899601 0.071462118173 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190311999577 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169102017328 0.0609392437508 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.3980295567 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.