Recently, the phenomenon of adventure sports and its corresponding imapcts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of exciting sports is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thorougly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that adventurous activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Within the realm of health, sporty people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of excercising, as well as physical health, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of sport in mental health. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both regular sports and high-risk sports apparently can be seen.
From a social standpoint, specific sports might increase the consequences of special facilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having a healthy society relate to this reality that the demerits of daramatic brain injuries pertain to dangerous sports. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of dangerous activities correlated negatively with the goals of doing sport. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of routine sports.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly belive that the benefits of extreme sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mental health prove the significance of remaining healthy, but also pinpoint doing sport implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55813953488 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12292476615 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9354662945 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164380182056 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558811264955 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416091532098 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946423893074 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371268653866 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.