The given pie charts represent various methods utilized to dispose of harmful garbage by three countries named Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Overall, the UK uses four ways to dump the waste except recycling, whereas the rest of the two countries are using the exact three same methods, recycling, incineration, and Underground, in different proportions. All of three nations are using fire the least to destroy harmful garbage.
In UK and Sweden, most of the wastage is dumped underground, which is accounted for 82% and 55% respectively, on the other hand, the Republic of Korea (RoK) prefers to recycle most of them. RoK and Sweden are handling their dangerous wastage by namely three methods, By recycling, by fire, or underground. Details present that 69% of rubbish are recycled in RoK which is just 25% for Sweden and UK is not using this method at all.
Surprisingly, the UK dumps 8% of national threatening waste in the sea, but it is utilizing the same portion of it for chemical treatments as well. Only 2% of the total hurtful debris is being incinerated by the UK, which is 20% and 9% respectively for Sweden and RoK.
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 56
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 73
- many people complain about stress at work How can employers reduce stress and what can employees do on their own to resolve this problem 84
- The chart shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76928560662 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2429918289 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795091782413 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391379296971 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038148462571 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574641988791 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378482499129 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.