The argument states that Maple County will get overdeveloped and to prevent examples of other two county has been given. Moreover, the council conjectures that the measure will lead to increase in housing prices. At first glance, the recommendation seems to be very convincing. But on close scrutiny it is found that many important factors are ignored by the author. Also, there are several loopholes in the argument.
Firstly, the arguer states that county is becoming overdeveloped. Thus, there should be no more development in the farmland of the county. But, no report or facts have been presented in the report to confirm the validity of the concern stated in the argument. Maybe this issue is not very serious and no extreme measures are required to be taken. The author of the letter should come up with some survey and statistical report so that severity of the issue becomes known. Therefore, there is no need to stop the development in the county.
Secondly, the proponents and opponents of the proposal are considering two counties. There is no evidence provided in the report that any of these county are similar in characteristics with the Maple County. So, looking at the price variations in mentioned two counties do not support the argument. The arguer should show some evidence regarding the sameness in these counties and thereby, make up mind towards increase or decrease of the of housing price of the Maple county.
Lastly, let us say that the two counties are similar to the Maple County but, the change in housing prices of Chestnut and Pine County are considered about 10 and 15 years ago respectively. The gap in time is large and thus, no conclusion can be drawn using reports from these counties. During this time gap there are many factors that may get changed such as economic factors, market condition also, the people' inclination toward purchasing new house. Thereby, making this point in the argument inconsequential.
To sum up, the aforementioned reasons should be considered by the council of the Maple County. There are many factors that needed to be addressed by the arguer. Before jumping to the conclusion impetuously all factors should be discerned and then decision should be made.
- "Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a re 83
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 60
- Never never give up, means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree? 60
- TPO -3 Independent Writing :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 86
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 371 350
No. of Characters: 1809 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.389 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.876 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.659 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.864 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.73 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.773 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.502 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'county' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'counties'.
Suggestion: counties
...ed and to prevent examples of other two county has been given. Moreover, the council c...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...ion seems to be very convincing. But on close scrutiny it is found that many important factors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 371.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02425876011 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73879384224 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3743901799 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7272727273 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8636363636 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2182353501 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619611529756 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551122852517 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112364250577 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033127137959 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.