The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.
"On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The writer of argument alleges the accident rate in the Balmer Island is directly corrolated with the mopeds service in the city and suggest a limitation in the number of the rental mopeds and believes this process could reduce the number of accidents in the town. Although the arguments looks reliable at the first glance, nonetheless when delve deeper there are rife of fallacies in the argument such as lack of the statistical data about accidents, unproviding reasons for reduction number of mopeds from 50 to 25, and comparing two different cities without presenting any evidences that shows they are compareable which I will explain completely now.
The first fallacy in the argument is that the author claims that in order to decline the number of accidents, they decide to limit mopeds while the writer does not present any statistical data that shows the main reason of the accidents. It is possible that the rate of accident that the mopeds are involved would be less than other causes like roads, private cares , or lack of driving signals. To support the argument, the author could hold a survey and study different reasons that may involve in the accident and provide reasonable statistical data.
Reduction the number of mopeds of is another problem of the argument. The author do not provide any reasonable evidence and do not mention any scientific method that applied to achieve this result that reducing 50 mopeds to 25 could show some reduction in the accident numbers. How they calculates the number of reduction? Furthermore, the argument do not provide any information about other type of transportation facilities. This reduction may affect the whole system of transportation if there is not any substitute for that. In order to remove fallacy of the argument, the writer could provide some additional information about other type of transportation system and shows that he do consider about substitution methods.
Finally, the author alleges this recommendation was worked for Seavile, so this method should work for Balmor. This allegation would not be true necessarily because the two cities may have different parameters like roads, passengers, culture, transportation system and the writer do not present any data that shows these two are similar in various cases. Therefore, it is suggested that the argument provide some additional data that shows these are compareble together.
In conclusion, though the argument looks reasonable at first, there are some problems in the argument such as lack of statistical data, comparing two different cities, and lack of information about other type of transportation system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | reeya kiran | 60 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position y 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 425 350
No. of Characters: 2181 1500
No. of Different Words: 180 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.54 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.132 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.746 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 167 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.351 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.402 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.617 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n other causes like roads, private cares , or lack of driving signals. To support ...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'calculate'
Suggestion: calculate
...ction in the accident numbers. How they calculates the number of reduction? Furthermore, t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 16.3942115768 177% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 425.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24705882353 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81012584973 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.4303278172 57.8364921388 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 119.503703932 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 23.324526521 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079150020568 0.218282227539 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355731946222 0.0743258471296 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562058212246 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486288287656 0.128457276422 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528585369266 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 12.3882235529 234% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 11.9071856287 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.