The author in this argument argues that Clearview should be a first choice for anyone seeking a place to retire. The author’s conclusion is mainly based on an assumption that there are many advantages of Clearview towm which include spectacular natural beauty, a consistent climate, lower taxes than any other neighboring town and low housing costs. Moreover, Clearview’s mayor promises many new schemes and programs which include improving schools, streets, as well as public services. Hence, a retiree can expect good health in future, too. This argument has many unanswered question and lack of support evidences, hence, it leads to dubiousness. It has several flaws in it.
Firstly, the author commits the “After this, therefore, because of this” fallacy. The author fails to consider many pratical cases. This argument assumes that Clearview’s mayor promises many new programs in the town to improve schools, streets, and other public services. It may be a case that mayor will fail to fulfill his promises and there will be no any reform in the town due to certain external factors. Hence, if such case is possible, Clearview should not be a top choice for retiree.
Secondly, the author in this argument fails to regard conditions and possibilities for the future, and wrongly assumes that correlation proves causality. It may be a possibility that the health in Clearview will decline in the future due to lack of money support or lack of doctors in area or many external reasons. The author ignores such a possibility and predict that health care would good as mayor launches new schemes in the town. As health care would decline, retirees will have huge loss as they are more prone to diseases.
Last but not least, it is supposed that taxes and housing costs in Clearview remain lower, also, housing costs in the region fallen significantly as compare to neighboring towns. The author only compare housing costs and taxes to neighbouring towns. It may be a case that housing costs and taxes are lower than that of Clearvies in other remote towns, also clamatic conditions are much better than Clearview. If such condition is possible, the author’s assumption leads to fiasco and baseless.
In conclusion, the author in this argument assumes fallacy the “after this, therefore, because of this”. Moreover, the author fails to cater support evidences and argument is beleaguered with unanswered questions, hence it leads to dubiousness. In addition, the author fails to regard many pragmatic possibilities and cases. To buttress this argument the author should induct cogent evidence that mayor will definitely follow his promises related to new programs, also doctors availability in future for better medical service to make the argument compelling.
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard ho 66
- Pets should be treated like family members. 70
- “Youth is wasted on the young”Agree or Disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person s childhood years the time from birth to twelve years of age are the most important years of a person s life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- "Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indica 86
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 446 350
No. of Characters: 2253 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.596 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.052 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.578 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 175 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.391 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.271 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.696 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.512 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'seeks'.
Suggestion: seeks
...iew should be a first choice for anyone seeking a place to retire. The author's co...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 538, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...Hence, a retiree can expect good health in future, too. This argument has many unanswered...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r promises many new programs in the town to improve schools, streets, and other p...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... fulfill his promises and there will be no any reform in the town due to certain e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 446.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30717488789 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8364114912 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443946188341 0.468620217663 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4608414589 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.913043478 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213417892597 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662929155004 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078812923622 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126207366539 0.128457276422 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651274966732 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.