The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:
“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
Editor of the national aeronautics magazine states that, manned space flights is costly and dangerous. Because, the cost of the unmanned space flights is low and risks are also low. Therefore, aeronautics department should plan the unmanned space flights. To get to this conclusion author of the national aeronautics magazine did some assumptions that can be summarized as follows.
First, author says the manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Author thinks that as the spaceship is manned then the astronauts require something to eat on the journey, which increases the cost of the journey. Along with food, the astronauts need some safety equipment and tool to use of the flight. So overall, the cost of the flight increases.
Second, the author also thought that the danger of loss of manpower may be happen under some circumstances, also there might be some recent accidents might be happened during flights.
Third, the author states that the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women. But, for most of the times the manned space flights are even require to repair the space instrument, which cannot be done by the unmanned space ships.
This suggest the author's suggestion is based on the wrong assumptions, therefore , it should be rejected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Devendra Prasad Chalise | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Raunaq | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Adebayo | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | shreyas | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | christine_cui | 55 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 100
- Recently Honey Bun replaced the use of sugar with aspartame a sugar substitute throughout its bakeries in the Northeast regions of the United States Contrary to initial expectations this change did not negatively impact our customer s preference So far on 30
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:"The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is esse 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...times the manned space flights are even require to repair the space instrument, which c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'repairing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: repairing
...e manned space flights are even require to repair the space instrument, which cannot be d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...manned space ships. This suggest the authors suggestion is based on the wrong assump...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ased on the wrong assumptions, therefore , it should be rejected.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271317829457 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0813953488372 0.0836205057962 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0348837209302 0.0520304965353 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00387596899225 0.0272364105082 14% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.116279069767 0.125424944231 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0426356589147 0.0416121511921 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64568108784 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0193798449612 0.026700313972 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127906976744 0.113004496875 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031007751938 0.0255425247493 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116279069767 0.0127820249294 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1427.0 2731.13054187 52% => OK
No of words: 232.0 446.07635468 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.15086206897 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.57801047555 85% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400862068966 0.378187486979 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254310344828 0.287650121315 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198275862069 0.208842608468 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120689655172 0.135150697306 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64568108784 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 207.018472906 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.469332199767 114% => OK
Word variations: 50.0307730095 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3333333333 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6782687643 57.7814097925 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.916666667 141.986410481 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 44.7643678161 51.9672348444 86% => OK
Elegance: 2.09433962264 1.8405768891 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.604499110271 0.441005458295 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139611145443 0.135418324435 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0515446397516 0.0829849096947 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.709913703889 0.58762219726 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.16180367145 0.147661913831 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301797110746 0.193483328276 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11902893589 0.0970749176394 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.283150082886 0.42659136922 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0972400148837 0.0774707102158 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359668102439 0.312017818177 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17691399357 0.0698173142475 253% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.33743842365 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.