The argument makes a number of unstated assumptions reagarding a twenty-year research that concluded upon the existance of correlation between the consumption of salicylates by the population and the drop in headaches reported. Taken as whole, these assumptions, if not true, seriously undermine the prediction power of such research.
Firstly, the argument fails in provide detailed information on the abrangece of the conducted research. For one, it could be argueed if the proportion of the participants fo the study who are used to consume preservated foods is big enough to make salicytates a reasonable influencing factor. Moreover, even if the research covered many inveterate consumers of salicylates, no information was provided on the representative of this consumers in the overall population. Without such information, the prediction made on the trend of the reported headaches cases made just considering the results of the mentioned research is not scientificly cogent.
The argument still leaves some unanswered questions. For example, no evidences were provided to discard other factors that could be influenced the drop of the number of the reported headaches. For example, better eating and drinking habits, as well as the practice of sports, are some well-recognized factors that could greatly influence positively the overall population healthy preventing headaches. Furthermore, the gender pattern of the participants could also influentiate its results, as women are soundly used to have more headaches due to its menstrual cycle.
Finally, the argument claims without warrant that the use of salicylates as flavour additives for foods would result in aa extra decline in the number of reported headaches. However, no evidence were presented supporting that a growth in the consumption of salicylates would have a linear impact on reduction of people's headaches. Indeed, more details should be provided on the reponse pattern over the headaches occurrence as result of incremental amounts of salicylates consumed.
To sum up, the argument holds its basis on several unproven assumptions that fails to make a convincing case that the prediction made by healthy experts on the residents of Mentia could be truested.
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students en 81
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 66
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'twenty-year research'.
Suggestion: twenty-year research
...mber of unstated assumptions reagarding a twenty-year research that concluded upon the existance of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n was provided on the representative of this consumers in the overall population. Wi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'headaches'' or 'headache's'?
Suggestion: headaches'; headache's
...rovided on the reponse pattern over the headaches occurrence as result of incremental amo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 341.0 441.139720559 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59824046921 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15045286255 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527859237537 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8134455042 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.357142857 119.503703932 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.70786347227 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130134074747 0.218282227539 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042148624566 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304481870363 0.0701772020484 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703721973202 0.128457276422 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215440849275 0.0628817314937 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.3799401198 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 48.3550499002 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.5979740519 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32208582834 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 98.500998004 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.