The given argument claims that usage of internet applications as recreational activity platforms is affecting the employees’ productivity. If a software which can detect and limit such applications is installed on the workstations of the workers, they will avoid accessing internet and thereby their efforts will be more towards productive tasks. However, I can see few flaws in the plan being proposed by the author.
First of all, it is not true that the recreational activities like gaming, watching movies and listening songs requires internet access. One can easily transfer these files on the workstations and indulge in all these activities without accessing internet. Since the software only detects internet usage, these activities will not get tracked. Hence the ultimate goal for increasing employees’ efforts toward efficient work will not meet.
Secondly, the idea for restricting personal or recreational activities on internet is vague. No description has been provided like which web applications will be restricted and which will be still allowed to access. Sometimes internet usage can be of paramount importance rather than having a detrimental effect. Employee might need to search for some information and google can be the only place where he can find answers to his questions. Also, there are some other activities like checking news, booking or cancelling flight tickets which will require immediate internet access. Since users will not have a clear idea if they are accessing valid web pages, there will be an apprehensive working environment which can be a demotivating factor for the better performance of employees.
Thirdly, the restriction of web applications on workstations does not guarantee that employees will not access them. These days every person has a smart phone which supports browsing. Even if they are restricted to use internet on workstations, they might access the same applications like facebook, amazon on their personal phones or tablets. Hence installation of software will not guarantee more working hours.
Clubbing up all the points I can say that installation of software will not be the safest idea to ensure more work hours. However there can be a different approach which can ensure the same result. The company can adopt a policy where an employee has to report about all the tasks that he has done based on hours daily to his superior. The superiors can judge if the time invested for the task is justified. Based on this approach the performance of a company can be monitored as well as improved.
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 40
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature. 70
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts— especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the state 80
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 33
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 57
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not OK. 'electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use' doesn't mean the Internet access is blocked but is tracked.
argument 3 -- OK.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 2109 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.144 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.813 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.636 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.52 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.307 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5