The following appeared in a memorandum from the human resources department of Diversified Manufacturing:
“Managers at our central office report that their employees tend to be most productive in the days immediately preceding a vacation. To help counteract our declining market share, we could increase the productivity of our professional staff members, who currently receive four weeks paid vacation a year, by limiting them to a maximum of one week’s continuous vacation time. They will thus take more vacation breaks during a year and give us more days of maximum productivity.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
The argument that the productivity can be increased by limiting the continuous vacation time to a maximum of one week is too short-sighted and misses important aspects that may have an impact on the employee productivity. The memorandum advocates the proposal of dividing the yearly leave into small pieces by showing the supposed fact that employees tend to be more productive in the days immediately preceding a vacation. However the memorandum misses important aspects to substantiate its argumentation.
First of all, the supposed fact on which the proposal bases is not thoroughly analyzed. A reason why employees work more productive in the days immediately preceding a vacation may be that they want to finish up some work before a long vacation. Limiting the continuous vacation time to a maximum of one week, however, might diminish employees' motivation to finish up work before vacation because employees would know that they would be back in a week, which is not a long period for a vacation in common sense. The memorandum lacks a thorough root cause analysis and therefore the proposal made might lead to productivity decrease.
On the other hand, a limit of continuous vacation time to a maximum of one week might have long-term negative effects which are not considered by the memorandum. For many people it is necessary to have more than one week continuously off in order to relax. So if employees are permitted to have maximum one week of continuous vacation they might not be able to relax which would lead to long-term productivity decrease. That is why the proposal made is too-short sighted and does not consider long-term affects the proposal might have.
In order to substantiate the argumentation and find the right way to increase the productivity, the human resources department should do a thorough root cause analysis in order to understand exactly why employees tend to work more productive in the days immediately before a vacation. Only after understanding the main reasons for productivity increase the human resources department should propose actions to increase productivity.
In summary, human resources department fails to analyse a supposed fact thoroughly and makes a short-sighted proposal basing on a not well-analyzed fact and disregards many other important aspects about employee productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-14 | jack521248123812 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students. 85
- The following appeared in a newspaper editorial:"The claims of some politicians that we are on the brink of an energy crisis are misguided. We have enough oil in reserve to see us through any production shortage and the supply of in-ground oil is in no da 90
- Do you think that TV programs, movies ans video games influence young people's behaviour?Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 72
- The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper."Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for over 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the co 80
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the human resources department of HomeStyle, a house remodeling business:“This year, despite HomeStyle’s move to new office space, we have seen a decline in both company morale and productivity, and a correspond 80
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 152 200
'On the other hand' means 'However'. It doesn't mean 'On another hand'.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1941 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.204 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.035 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 101 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.485 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5