The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Given notion is although correct in some situations, but it is not the case which is always true. We can estimate greatness of personalities, only when we are able correctly construe their deeds. This understanding process, sometime takes years; therefore, there are some cases, where greatness of some people is praised posthumously.
Galileo, the famous philosopher, disabused some commonly followed conventions of catholic church. People of his times were not able to recognize his ideas, because they found them impossible according to their believes at that times. After some centuries, when scientists expressed consensus with Galileo's idea, Galileo's greatness was confirmed by the world. We can see that this case reasonably supports the given notion.
However, if contemporary people are knowledgeable enough to admire, to understand the greatness of someone, the case is completely different. For example, when Archimedes formulated the buoyancy principle, his king reward him for his success. King was cognizant of what actually he (Archimedes) had done; this made him to recognize the greatness of this early scientist.
Now days, we have enough facilities like patents, publications , conferences, manifestos etc.; this makes anyone of us to easily present his or her ideas. Therefore, with these facilities new generation is less likely to conform the given notion. For example, we can evaluate a politician on basis of her work records and manifestos. Similarly, a sports person can be judged on grounds of her performance in concerned sports; her games could be easily viewed on television, and we can then decide her greatness on basis of her game play.
Thus, we can see that given notion is rarely having any significance in present world. Though, this notion was true in some earlier times, when there was a severe deficit of intellectual skills, like for example, at times of Galileo. But now time has drastically changed; now people are having enough knowledge to assess; to wisely decide ones worthiness; to determine the virtue of one's greatness.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-30 | kidney | view | |
2016-09-08 | leanwolfketan | 50 | view |
2020-05-30 | kidney | view | |
2021-07-18 | souptikc80 | 50 | view |
2021-06-01 | Ashwitha Reddy | 20 | view |
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent 85
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 73
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 92
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 54
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 81
Sentence: For example, when Archimedes formulated the buoyancy principle, his king reward him for his success.
Description: The fragment king reward him is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace reward with verb, past tense
Sentence: Now days, we have enough facilities like patents, publications , conferences, manifestos etc.; this makes anyone of us to easily present his or her ideas.
Description: The fragment Now days is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace Now days with Nowadays
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 326 350
No. of Characters: 1687 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.249 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.175 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.791 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.071 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.169 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5