1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The author of the statement concludes that when technology has invented the ability of human to think for themselves will definitely diminished. While others believe that technology is considerably vital for advancing task without any doubt. I agree with this claim. Consider the both views in what follows, and then my point would be delineated.
To begin with, as well know that technology might be detrimental for students. As a matter of fact, some students utilize net for solving their project in the college. However, they allocate a great deal of their time for suffering in website that is not corresponds to their academic education. Indeed they become addict to the net.
However, technology might be a precious tool in the current era due to the fact a considerable amount of task such as daily schedule and finding our path act through technology. One of the striking example that is relevant to this issue that using GPS in the contemporary era. GPS is a worthwhile device for everyone in the earth without any doubt. Indeed, using GPS increase our ability of my mind. Both mind and technology has involved for working it. This indicates that a variety of technology expand our knowledge and experience.
Nonetheless, a variety of technology such as telescope need to power of mind. In fact, they have a tremendous of harmony together. Indeed, our mind is supplement to devise new method and theories and ideas. By considering this fact that some technology are dependent to the mind of human being.
By taking into account, every device can be had positive effect or negative effect in the community. Some advancement in the technology is greatly vital and imperative. Beside they implement via brain of human. Whereas, a scintilla of them is deleterious for mind especially for student in the academic setting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 50
- Statement of purposes 80
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects." 70
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving he 16
- Personal History Statement---1 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...to think for themselves will definitely diminished. While others believe that technology i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...orresponds to their academic education. Indeed they become addict to the net. Howe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nonetheless, so, then, well, whereas, while, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04934210526 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80213541136 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559210526316 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6007034276 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.7727272727 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8181818182 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18191438688 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522067990394 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628683694291 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103618430387 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489350367929 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.