The prompt recommends that governments should place minimal restrictions on scientific research and development. Undoubtedly, scientific reasearch and development should be minimally restricted to ensure accelarated advancement of technology as scientific progress and technological marvel touches all aspects of life equally. Technological advancement provides several key technologies in various significant domains such as infrastructure, energy and power, weapons ,and agriculture. The technologies that are developed help in securing an economic advantage for the industry of a nation.
Scientific research and development involves an empirical approach in which various experiments are to be conducted to reach satisfactory results. Additionally, acquiring permits and clearances further slows down the place of scientific research and development as a whole. Hence, for speedy research and development, an enviroment where minimal restrictions exist becomes a necessity. This is evident from the speed with which private companies are able to do research and development while government agencies take decades. Private companies are able to do so by offshoring their reasearch and development to countries which are least restrictive whereas government departments remain stuck in the web of getting compilances and permits for further reasearch . Taking the example of missile development MBDA had to outsource its R&D to United States as they were unable to get permits for cruise missile development in France and they also could not find test ranges in France. By outsourcing R&D to the United States where there are plenty of test ranges and permits come in easy they were able to develop their cruise missile quickly in just 18 months from protoptyping to first production model. This helped them secure the tender while their competitors in France were still then finding it hard to get their designs off the drawing board.
Technological development is mostly aimed at increasing or improving current processes of industrial production. When minimal restrictions exist on development of technology industries of a country are able to quickly develop monoply in global markets as their production costs drive down and they are able to mass produce very cost effectively. In Europe, Denmark has a eighty percent market share in agriculture industry. Today Denmark four times as many agricultural produce per hectare for the same intial cost as any other country could, this gives them a competitive edge which allows them to undercut any competition in agriculture markets. Denmark attributes to the relaxation in rules for agricultural R&D it introduced five decades ago.
Even though their are many advantages of having minimal restrictions on scientific reasearch. It is often argued that
there is always a risk of catastrophe say a experiment goes wrong. There is a possibility that a GMO crop may be accidentally introduced that kills of rest of the crops and also makes the land barren, genetic experimentation on humans is always seen as a dream of a mad scientist, and the fear of AI taking over is now even more present. What this view however fails to account for is that most scientific research takes place in isolation away from general public and the scale of research is usually very small when compared to scale of mass production, there are ususally only a few hundred subjects in research while scales of production go in millions. Moreover, scientific research is always carried out by scientists and the scientific community has always proved to be moraly and ethically repsonsible. Even corporations that are hungry for profits maintain high safety standards in R&D as the fallout from one gone wrong experiment is enough to bring down any big corporation. If an expirement goes wrong then corporations are forced to take responsibility and pay compensation.
In conclusion we can say that for the advancement of any nation it is of key importance to ensure that scientific research and development stays minimally restricted.
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 66
- Claim Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students Reason College students like people prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisions 66
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help pr 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nfrastructure, energy and power, weapons ,and agriculture. The technologies that a...
^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the least'.
Suggestion: are the least
...arch and development to countries which are least restrictive whereas government departme...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lances and permits for further reasearch . Taking the example of missile developme...
^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ost effectively. In Europe, Denmark has a eighty percent market share in agricult...
^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun produce seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much agricultural produce', 'a good deal of agricultural produce'.
Suggestion: much agricultural produce; a good deal of agricultural produce
...e industry. Today Denmark four times as many agricultural produce per hectare for the same intial cost as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...R&D it introduced five decades ago. Even though their are many advantages of having min...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...duced five decades ago. Even though their are many advantages of having minimal r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tific reasearch. It is often argued that there is always a risk of catastrophe sa...
^^^
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ere is always a risk of catastrophe say a experiment goes wrong. There is a possi...
^
Line 8, column 451, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...arch takes place in isolation away from general public and the scale of research is usually ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3444.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 630.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00997013923 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1291816339 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 324.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1086.3 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4915226251 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.76 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331820431783 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914376514763 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967383673974 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164416551003 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601349312751 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 100.480337079 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.