In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The statement above asserts that it is impossible to make an important contribution without first being strongly influenced by the past achievements. I agree with such an assertion as long as the “being strongly influenced” equals to knowing about the past achievement; one cannot be influenced without knowing the past achievement. Nevertheless, although it is impossible to make a great contribution without first being influenced by the past achievements, the overdue “strong influence” also can make it impossible to make a new contribution.
To begin with, to make a significant contribution it is necessary to be influenced by the past achievements through knowing and examining them. First, invention of the complex systems absolutely needs the knowledge of simpler comprising parts. To illustrate, think about the automobile. Obviously, without having been influenced by knowledge of making wheel, gears and engine, it was impossible to even have a concept of automobile, let alone the invention of it.
Another reason is that past achievements are the only clues leading us to make something new and practicable. It precludes individuals to waste their time on making contributions that already is optimized. Consider a personal experience. Having inspired by the lightning, I was going to research on a method to fix nitrogen in soil with electricity. I came to know that there is another economic way of fixing nitrogen in soil without the need of a high voltage electric arc. Then I stopped my research because even if I made a conclusion, it has no usage the current time with far better methods.
However, individuals should not be influenced to the point that be captivated by the past contributions. Many of the scientific blind spots and biases are made of overdue aggrandizing the past achievements. Consider the Albert Einstein. When he was challenging the widely accepted Newtonian laws of gravity, he was alone because many thought that he is doing vain. Newtonian laws were always fit. But the orbit of planet Mercury, in scale of a fingertip in the millions of miles, was inconsistent with that theory. Einstein, different from others praising Newton, corrected the fault with conceiving a new theory: Curvature of time and space dimensions.
In short, creating important contributions absolutely requires being influenced by the past achievements in terms of knowledge and insight. But, when the influence of the past achievements becomes exaggeratedly strong, individuals become prone to develop biases toward achievement’s perfection and not be able to see the flaws.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-10-24 | ralfraihat | 83 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 80
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre product 80
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten movie rental stores Since we are famous fo 72
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within this group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing 69
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 409 350
No. of Characters: 2133 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.497 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.215 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.092 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 97 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 77 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.476 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.126 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.507 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5