Follow the author claim that it is impossible to achieve some contribution without regarding the past achievements which concern these fields. Although this statement sounds a little extreme at first glance, I believe that it describes exactly the way that things evolve in the world.
On the one hand, everything is created come from somewhere, without exception. For example, when we think in a discovery very primitive, the first thought that comes in mind is the creation of fire by our ancestors. Even, these primitive people have not discovered anything close to fire before that event, they are influenced by natural events which could be occurred, like a lightning puts fire in a tree, and then they first saw that this strange hot event could be useful for cooking or hunting, giving a strong motivation to these people to try to reproduce that element.
On the other hand, in more modern times, some field has just been thought only revealed in nearly 70 years ago and before that, no one thinks or imagines about that someday we have the ability to fly to the universe and discover another planet. However, in fact, that there was numerous project that preceded the greatest achievement of the first spaceship ever made or the first man on the Moon. Every test contributed to creating small pieces of data that after a long time could be agglutinate into a very big knowledge used by the last missions. It is also significant to say that these achievements are timeless, even the most ancient discoveries and data are being used nowadays. As Elson Musk one time said, the first books that he started to read at the beginning of SpaceX were very old engineering books, like " Structure: Or Why things don't Fall Down" written in the 1960s.
Furthermore, we can apply this concept to the way contemporary society works. The history of mankind is largely used to help the development of world civilization. In almost the entire world that is used, since the ancient Greek times, the concept of democracy. Also, the basis of the constitution and fundamental laws come from this epoch. These pieces of evidence have proven that every around us on these days is influenced by past and these old achievements which were proven evidently to be useful.
In conclusion, we can acknowledge that with no past achievements it is impossible to make a great contribution in our society, and that work with all fields of endeavor. Since the technology to laws, everything has your background based on previous events.
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the posi 58
- 138. Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning. 事实Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely 83
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 54
- Knowledge is an important part of our life Some people prefer having deep knowledge about one particular subject while others prefer having widespread knowledge about a variety of subjects Which do you prefer and why 82
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the posi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 852, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s, like ' Structure: Or Why things dont Fall Down' written in the 1960s. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92325581395 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69326925815 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4029922296 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.529411765 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2941176471 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210405121355 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564671844394 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681294075427 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12176272179 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502442635044 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.