In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
The issue of whether the leadership needs to be changed after a certain period of time in order for any groups to succeed is a controversial one. It is true that indefinite leadership often causes many problems, but there are many cases the require steady and consistent leadership. I disagree with the statements and believe that we can get a better result with long and stable leadership.
Admittedly, there is a saying, “Stagnant water is bound to rot.” It indicated that the leaders need to be replaced with new people once a while. Most leaders in history had good intentions and passions making the nations or the groups better; however, as they got used to the power and its privilege, they committed or got involved corruptions. For example, the current President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, is the first Native American President of Latin America. When he was elected as the President, he established and implement many policies which were friendly to the natives and the unprivileged people. During his second term, President Morales morally decayed and tried to amend the constitution to allow himself serving consecutive terms more than twice. Furthermore, despite the poor economy in Bolivia, the president pressed on with building a new presidential palace in 2018. He somehow maintains a relatively high approval rate; yet, President Morales is no longer considered as a decent leader.
Nevertheless, there is also a brighter side of longer leadership. For the larger groups, such as a nation, it is sometimes required that the leadership stays the same and consistent. Once the national policy is set up, it takes years to see the result. Besides, there are several times that the new leadership doesn’t want to succeed in the policies of the prior leader. For example, during the presidency of Obama, the national health care system was implemented, called Obama care, to ensure that no one in the United States lived without health insurance. However, once President Trump took the office, he has been trying to undo the Obama care. Even though the constitution of the United States allows two consecutive terms for the president, sometimes it is difficult to make significant changes in people’s lives. On the other hand, Japan doesn’t have the restriction to limit the consecutive terms for its leader, the Prime Minister. Although there are other problems in the political system of Japan obviously, the Prime Minister has the drift power to prosecute his policies.
Moreover, if leaders are allowed to serve within limited timeframes, they tend not to consider the long-term consequences but focus on short-term achievements when they make decisions. It usually occurs in the management of the corporations. When the board of directors appoints a professional executive as a CEO, he or she pays more attention to the business of which the profit is realized in the near future since the professional executive keeps the job only when achievements are visible. However, there are many stockholders who concern about the future of the company and the instant outcome is sometimes the trade-off of a long-term investment.
In conclusion, although the leadership may become decayed and corrupted as it keeps the power for a long time, the steady and consistent leadership may result in more benefits than problems. It may provide the leadership adequate time to implement the ideas and policies for the groups and consider the fundamental future instead of near-sighted accomplishments.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising f 69
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 16
- In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hip needs to be changed after a certain period of time in order for any groups to succeed is a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...many problems, but there are many cases the require steady and consistent leadership. I di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;Stagnant water is bound to rot.' It indicated that the leaders need to be...
^^
Line 3, column 1024, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o longer considered as a decent leader. Nevertheless, there is also a brighter s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... drift power to prosecute his policies. Moreover, if leaders are allowed to serv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he trade-off of a long-term investment. In conclusion, although the leadership m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2972.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 567.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24162257496 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87972968509 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96575936739 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514991181658 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 944.1 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3706930304 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.88 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.68 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0229989916916 0.243740707755 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00648826454039 0.0831039109588 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0164470043174 0.0758088955206 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0152320337782 0.150359130593 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012348361752 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.