To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
The high ethical and moral standards are necessary to be an effective leader. The author's claim seems to be right at first glance. However, the highest ethical and moral standards are not the only things that make any leader effective. I agree with the author due to the following reasons.
Consider any great leader like Mahatma Gandhi or Nelson Mandela, they are great leaders not only as they were a good orator. The policy, the work without any self motives were responsible for their rise as an effective leader. Mahatma Gandhi during India's independence movement even with the very cruel regime didn't leave his ethics and principles. There are historically many examples of many such great leaders who fought for their principles no matter what the situation was. There is no lack of leaders but to rise above and to build a personality such that even opposition has to listen to you that is what makes any leader great and different from others.
The effective leader always first thinks about the big picture rather than applying populist policies. Nowadays, many people would have felt that public officials are compromising with their values to gain monetary or political gains. There is a lack of ethics today. For instance, consider today's leaders like Donald Trump, King Jong Un, and Xi Jin Ping, they all have ambitions of making their countries great in the world while forgetting basic human rights, ethics, morals. The leader is elected by the public vote so, people are always watching him what he is doing and how? The leader should always present the right example to his public by following the principles. This would send the right message to the masses. Historically, we have many examples such as Hitler from Germany, with his powerful army and unethical plots also defeated by ethical forces. If public officials will not follow basic ethics and morals standards then it would make the world full of deceit and scams.
In Conclusion, there should be a stringent following of ethics, principles and morals standards by public officials to make our world more and more prosperous. This indeed will reward public official respect of many and will be treated as a great and effective leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | NobodyUp | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | p2312vasant | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | p2312vasant | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | shailesh | 83 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 67
- Some people work for the same organiation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ovement even with the very cruel regime didnt leave his ethics and principles. There ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98921832884 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4046843173 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525606469003 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4632028272 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.55 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322092912084 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104164158073 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941280439063 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222472467101 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723828136404 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.