The claim that the best way to prepare young people for leadership in various fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition is a compelling one. However, the claim is not something that I can fully agree with due to its 'all or nothing' approach by completely disregarding the importance of competition.
Coorperation and team work are important values needed when in position of leadership and young people would have to learn how to work closely without conflicts with other people. If an impasse is reached and conflicting opinions arise, they will need to 'agree to disagree' about their differences, decide on solution and go with it. This way, an organization or company can continue working harmoniously with favourable results. For example in a football team, the players might not agree with some of the tactical decisions of the manager, such as the role each of the players should take. However, players should cast their any disagreement and go along with the decision of the manager, to acheive a common goal which is to win games.
However, if everyone was to 'play by the book' and not have competition, we can see that an entire country might suffer. It is none the more true than in a democratic country that has various political parties with different idealogies and vision for the country. The whole idea that opposition parties exists is to challenge the current adminstration policies and decisions. This helps keep the current government on their toes and not be complacent with their policy-making decisions
Competition will help serve the people better because the ruling party will know that any slip ups will result in them being ousted from the government.
Further, leadership that has no competition will stifle creativity and innovation. Talent will not be motivated to constantly overacheive and seek to improve the organisation, perhaps by taking over the leadership role, if they are expected to coorperate with current leaders in their organisation. As a result, organisations will suffer.
In conclusion, we can see that leadership regardless of industry or fields should consist of a balance of coorperation and competition. We can see that the application to the extreme, where only the presence of cooperation in leadership roles is expected can have deleterous outcome. Therefore, the truth of the claim is limited.
- "The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards." 70
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- Argument Topic :“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improv 54
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... team, the players might not agree with some of the tactical decisions of the manager, such...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234042553191 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.160756501182 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0614657210402 0.0880659088768 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0520094562648 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0378250591017 0.0444667217837 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130023640662 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0354609929078 0.0406280797675 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97281944226 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0330969267139 0.030933414821 107% => OK
Particles: 0.00236406619385 0.0016655270985 142% => OK
Determiners: 0.108747044917 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0449172576832 0.0249443105267 180% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0141843971631 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2385.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 388.0 452.878318584 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14690721649 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360824742268 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298969072165 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216494845361 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149484536082 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97281944226 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 219.290929204 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 59.9246019431 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2521984629 59.4972553346 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.294117647 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 52.7204366283 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.59433962264 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43335805188 0.391690518653 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126081085219 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0829510922968 0.077325440228 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587559585702 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187046859975 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162801663226 0.161403998019 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143093380396 0.0892212321368 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267375117665 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0820930253605 0.0692045440612 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262901481747 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14569772401 0.0653680567796 223% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.