The argument concentrates on improving one of the most important soft skill: leadership. It states that instilling a sense of cooperation will prepare leaders in a much better way than competition. However, the argument has it's own pros and cons.
Inculcating cooperation among young minds is quite essential. Knowing how to cooperate with each other is what makes a successful leader. Consider team sports, where every player has a crucial role which contributes towards winning of the team. If any of the player does not perform, it affects the performance of whole team. In my school, our basketball team was one of the best in whole region because of the understanding and coordination we all shared. Every member motivated other to perform better. Even if one person from our team had been indifferent, it would have led to downfall of everyone.
What defines a great leader is how he or she makes his whole team to follow and cooperate with each other. Leader plays a very important role in maintaining harmony in the team. Leaders in government, industry and other fields usually have to meet a lot of people, and knowing how to cooperate with them is important for a successful leader. For example, a successful leader in government should be able to organize people in different departments. He has to cooperate efficiently with the people he leads. In business, a leader must cooperate with employees to have a successful corporation. This requires a strong sense of cooperation, so a society should prepare its young people by instilling this quality in them.
On the other hand, it should also be considered that competition is what makes people perform and outshine. It definitely brings out leadership qualities among them. Some have it naturally and some of them develop it through different situations. I remember in my childhood, my father always encouraged a healthy competition by motivating me to perform better whether in sports, academics or any other co-curricular activity. This developed leadership qualities in me in a much better way. Through competition only I realized there were leadership qualities instilled in me and I worked towards polishing them further.
We should recognize that both are important in our society. For example, although there exists fierce competition between different companies, they often have to cooperate with each other. A company may compete with another company in a kind of product, but they may have other areas in which they work together. A company providing searching service may be working together with a company providing safety software, such as sharing some algorithms or some data. However, they may have minor competition on advertising on another service. This illustrates that cooperation is also important in this society and we should instill in our youth a sense of both.
Therefore, a conclusion can be drawn that building a sense of cooperation is important for creating better leaders but a healthy competition should not be avoided. In fact, it should be encouraged. Only one cannot be chosen as both play a crucial role in development of great leaders.
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competitio 50
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 29
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competitio 50
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competitio 50
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competitio 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in fact, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2630.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13671875 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94180826021 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2756374858 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1875 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59375 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199433627727 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049504286098 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708047446645 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10113648387 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606676332007 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.