Imposing quota restrictions on household garbage disposal would have several different reactions from populace. Few may like it and others might oppose it. On close analysis we can see that the cons of such implementation precede over the pros. The people might find it problematic for them to limit their wastes as different house holds have different requirements and generate different amount of garbage. This could lead to illegal deposition or collection of waste resulting in increasing unhygienic conditions.
The proper way to curb the overwhelming amounts of waste would be to limit the use of harmful and non-decomposing items and categorize the waste disposal systems. People can be encouraged to keep separate bins for organic waste and plastic waste. This would help in proper decomposition of waste. The organic waste can be used to make fertilizers and the rest can be sent to recycling industries, while a ban over plastic items would ensure less amounts of non-decomposing waste.
One might suggest that imposition of such methods would take a huge amount of effort and will incur costs to government. But the outcomes of such implementations can be used to generate revenues, by selling the fertilizers and recycling of non-decomposing items would decrease the raw material costs to the consumer industries.
In conclusion the idea of limiting the collection of waste from any household would result in a mix response from the public and is likely to fail.
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 66
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from the owner of a skate shop in Central Plaza. "Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandali 41
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think that it is awaste of valuable money. What is your opinion? 11
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...n household garbage disposal would have several different reactions from populace. Few may like i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: Little may
...eral different reactions from populace. Few may like it and others might oppose it. On ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun amounts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e a ban over plastic items would ensure less amounts of non-decomposing waste. One ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2268907563 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0374867612 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2245422077 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135360745364 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507457140123 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430983859601 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911206030583 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313783144191 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.