The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement asserts that, we need to praise all the good works and ignore the bad works. Though it is true that, by praising others in doing good job, bolsters them in further good deeds, but that should not be the perfect practice as there are several facts which should be taken into consideration. Similarly, ignoring the reprehensible act, will not solve the problem rather intensify it, and that is why, I agree with the statement with some qualifications.
As per human psychology, we people are encouraged by recognition. By praising, people are encouraged to do better, but there are some subtle drawbacks too of that over praising or praising in all deeds. When a child grows up, if it does a bad thing, we scold or warn it, not to repeat that further. Similarly, if we praise for doing a good job, it will be encouraged and think of it to do further in future. But at the same time as the child grows up, he will gradually be dependent on others recognition. If there comes a critical situation, what others did not face before and thus people may not praise or bolster him, he will be in a ambivalent situation, whether to do it or not. But sometimes, in critical situations, we need to take some important decision based on our own prudence, and at that time if we hope for others appreciation, it will worsen the situation further. So, we can say, we should encourage by praising on extraordinary achievements and encourage them to do that type of job more frequently, at the same time, should reserve our self in appreciating all types of ordinary good deeds.
Similarly, in case of bad and reprehensible jobs, if we remain silent and avoid the situation, it will not bring any good, rather worsen the condition. For example, if a person have any attitude like a racist, we should stand against him, no matter what, I am attacked or not. If we do not, he will not get the bad side of his attitude and by time, he may have get some follower as there were no one to show them whether it was bad or good. In repercussion, one day the person who avoided the situation, can find him in quagmire, where he is the minority and facing the bully from another racist. So, as people learn by seeing others and others attitude toward an act, we should always react to a bad habits and make it clear why it is reprehensible.
To conclude, we can say that, we should always praise the good works but that should be within a certain limit so that the person can grow confident, to do a praiseworthy job in his own, without thinking of others appreciation all the time. At the same time, should face the bad practice strongly, rather than being reticent all the time.
- "The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors: "Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satell 16
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 50
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 50
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you dis 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ncouraged and think of it to do further in future. But at the same time as the child grow...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...s up, he will gradually be dependent on others recognition. If there comes a critical ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ot praise or bolster him, he will be in a ambivalent situation, whether to do it ...
^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...f his attitude and by time, he may have get some follower as there were no one to s...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.150635208711 0.240241500013 63% => OK
Verbs: 0.161524500907 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0798548094374 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0562613430127 0.0497285424764 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0780399274047 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.121597096189 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0290381125227 0.0406280797675 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67100338846 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0199637023593 0.030933414821 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00362976406534 0.0016655270985 218% => OK
Determiners: 0.0961887477314 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0399274047187 0.0249443105267 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145190562613 0.0148568991511 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2675.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 484.0 452.878318584 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52685950413 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.289256198347 0.366273622748 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.181818181818 0.280924506359 65% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142561983471 0.200843997647 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.095041322314 0.132149295362 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67100338846 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448347107438 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.6706459129 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.8888888889 23.380412469 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7969147476 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.611111111 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 23.380412469 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.674092028746 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 45.0707070707 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.01840490798 1.64882698954 62% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30793541643 0.391690518653 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131521055656 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0632547309486 0.077325440228 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520452639034 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137569799063 0.149214159877 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137680150211 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795219239891 0.0892212321368 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384733843147 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0626168136422 0.0692045440612 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244016376236 0.275328986314 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424582407464 0.0653680567796 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.