The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching has been known since ages. We learn everyday despite our age and we tend to teach everyday; both come directly and indirectly. It is an established fact that teaching styles differ from one person to the other and it is mostly evident in academic settings where no two teachers teach the same subject material the same way. It cannot be refuted that how receptive a student is depends to a greater percentage, on the one who is teaching. The assertion presented states that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions which I agree with totally but also states that negative actions should be ignored which raises the argument. I do not agree that the negative ones should be ignored.
To begin with, a student in any setting will not know what to deem as a negative action until he is told or alerted. For instance, when a baby starts to learn how to speak, it is receptive to anything it hears and can pronounce. In most cases parents begin to talk with modesty and try to prevent saying bad words but unfortunately parents are not able to take full control what the baby learns. The baby ends up picking up bad words eventually. My point is since the baby is naïve to the bad and good and so will have to be thought when the time to segregate is due. Another example; when I started working as a cashier in a wholesale store, I did not know most of the rules so I had to be thought. For instance, that going for lunch is compulsory after six hours of work and without adhering, punishment was going to be meted on you.
Also, praising positive actions absolutely good because it encourages the student. When a student does a good deed and is praised, the enthusiasm he feels makes him yearn to do more so that the praise will keep coming. In the work setting, employees are recognized and awarded when they are productive or go beyond a mark. The praises sometimes come in the form of incentives and bonuses. That alone is a form of encouragement to do more and to others.
Additionally, stringent teachers see good results. Eventhough, praise is good, when a teacher is strict, the students turn out to be disciplined. It is human nature to break rules and overlook the power of authorities when negative actions are ignored. It is very evident in high schools where most students have reached adolescence and rebel against authority. When strict punishments are meted on rule breakers, it deter others from repeating and brings about discipline.
However, one may argue that when the student is educated or is made aware before hand about the negative actions, they would not do it at all. Like in Sunday schools where kids are thought good from wrong. But it is a fact that, that does not often deter some kids from misbehaving. That is why punishment is good.
I do not agree to the assertion because a person will not know bad from wrong when not thought and even when he is thought, meting out punishment puts him in the right place. Being stringent results in discipline and praising good action encourage more good actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-25 | chandana mettu | 33 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 70
- Claim: People who say they are bored should look inward rather than blaming the circumstances in which they find themselves.Reason: Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self-motivation. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 63
- Genius is nothing more than another term for obsession. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ing has been known since ages. We learn everyday despite our age and we tend to teach ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ay despite our age and we tend to teach everyday; both come directly and indirectly. It ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: ESTABLISHED_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'a fact'.
Suggestion: a fact
...oth come directly and indirectly. It is an established fact that teaching styles differ from one pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deters'?
Suggestion: deters
...ishments are meted on rule breakers, it deter others from repeating and brings about ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...he student is educated or is made aware before hand about the negative actions, they would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, for instance, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2517.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61834862385 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52821532667 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493577981651 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.740098251 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7931034483 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7931034483 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149129724753 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358975659624 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614871917437 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688708239391 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602257138939 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.