The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether people as educator, employer, or parent should use positive actions instead of negative ways to teach children or not. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find that some people hold the opinion that education with only love is the best way to make children have good learnings, while others have an opposite attitude that positive and negative actions should both be used in education. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with the former statement that we should not only teach our children with positive actions. The following discussion will explore my view.
First of all, the positive action, of course, is a good manner to our children. In recent ten years, many scholars support the claim that positive actions could bring more good effects to students. According to the research conducted by executive Yuan in our country, increasing praises to children who under 16 years old could promote their learning motives and performance about 15%. This phenomenon is not little. In fact, many countries have the same result in the research of the education. Such would be the direct evidence that bears witness to the fact that children should be taught by the celebration.
On the other hand, fault and failure are also the methods to make children have excellent learning. Blindly praising and ignoring mistakes and shortcomings to learner could make he or she run on the wrong pave for a long way. Actually, the progress of human is achieved in the process of continuous trial-and-error. Therefore, we should not give up the chance which can let children face their problems and fix them, and learn more in this process.
Both positive and negative actions have their own advantages and disadvantages, and none of them is the best way to teach children to become wonderful people. In fact, we could take different approaches depending on the different situations and children's personalities. For example, if someone is hard to accept his or her flaws, educators should use more positive way than negative. In contrast, if another one expects to learn everything and wish to know where he or she is doing not so well, then we would point out his or her problems more than the counterpart.
In conclusion, despite the fact that most people in the recent world encourage to take positive means in teaching, there are still many factors we should consider discreetly. Thus, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. “Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the compla 82
- In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in 85
- When needing to discuss upset or controversial issues, some people like to use email or text messages. Others like to use phones or voice-messages. Which do you prefer and why? 73
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 81
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew of the issue about whether people as educator, employer, or parent should use...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, of course, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01199040767 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72257566779 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549160671463 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5838519031 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239742144009 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626126578968 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950188630135 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115446984641 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916481850727 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.