Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Change is the law of nature and it brings new energy. This is true in any field such as business, politics, education, and government, but it is questionable that changing leadership every five years is the surest path of success. The leader can be changed after few years and new can be appointed, and before appointing them their ability to lead a big business, organization or a country need to be tested throughly. In any big organization leadership can't be changed just because it has to be changed every five years to make sure success. There are many examples which presents changing leadership just for the sake of change caused disaster in the society.
In USA, every four years elections happen and all the prospective candidates do campaigns, debates, and present future plans about country to prove themsleves a better candidate and many times this happened that previous president won again and became president for example Barack Obama, Bill Clinton. People chose them because they were having better vision for country than other candidates. On the other hand, if it seen as to make sure path of success they need to step down after their term, then it might not be good for country.
In any management change is necessary, this should not happen that only person is leading for whole life time. Change in leader can be seen as other people should get opportunity also, so that new talent will get chance. Some upper management positions need years of experience and particular knowledge, in this case it might not wise to change leader every five years.
Therefore, it is good to change leaders in any field, so that one person or one group of people doesn't get dominance, and other people also get chance, but it can't be considered that it ensure success, it totally depend on leader, how he manages, and lead a organization and country. Some test measure can be kept in any organization to test every few years to check old leaders are still best to lead or can be replaced with new.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people forleadership in government, industry, or other fields is byinstilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...n that only person is leading for whole life time. Change in leader can be seen as other ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
...ered that it ensure success, it totally depend on leader, how he manages, and lead a o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...end on leader, how he manages, and lead a organization and country. Some test mea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79714285714 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52265004813 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505714285714 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8259882784 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.153846154 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194000722341 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849724069785 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799985143018 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116835392886 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472151598164 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.