The author here claims that it is necessary to step down the people in power of any organization after a brief period of 5 years because he believes that the surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. I disagree to the author's claim to a great extent but not completely.
The explanation of my stand shall begin with the following question: Had Microsoft been such a huge organization had Bill Gates stepped down after a brief service of 5 years? Well the answer is NO. You look at any well established organization in the world like Apple, Tata Industries, etc, all have had a single leader over the years with the lower level being promoted from time to time. We all know what happened to Apple after Steve Jobs was sacked and what happened after he was reappointed.
An age old proverb goes as follows: EXPERIENCE IS THE BEST TEACHER. How will one gain experience if he has to abdicate his position after 5 years? An organization excels only if its employees are happy and to achieve this, it takes years to know what it takes to keep them happy.
Also, with great power comes great responsibility and to be responsible enough it takes a prolonged interval of time. In case a person has to step down after a term of 5 years and he is at his peak at the time of abdicating, then that might be a heavy loss to the organization. The new successor will have to start from square one and in process learn all the tricks of the trade which will again require some time. Thus, this practice will result into a rise and fall pattern of the company.
Just like we say that every coin has two sides, the above practice of prolonged leadership too has its negative consequences. This might result into dictatorship and the demolish of democracy. For example the General Parvez Musharaf of Pakistan withheld is power for over a decade and misused it. Another example of the same was Hitler.
Thus, in my view,the surest path to success for any enterprise isn't revitalization through new leadership. In fact, this is the best way to review a diminishing or a crumpling enterprise and not a established business, political or government field.
- If rituals did not exist we have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves social and culturally. 86
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 16
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 86
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...This might result into dictatorship and the demolish of democracy. For example the General P...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...the same was Hitler. Thus, in my view,the surest path to success for any enterpri...
^^^^
Line 11, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rest path to success for any enterprise isnt revitalization through new leadership. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 196, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...shing or a crumpling enterprise and not a established business, political or gove...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in fact', 'in my view', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252983293556 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.143198090692 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0715990453461 0.0880659088768 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0334128878282 0.0497285424764 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0477326968974 0.0444667217837 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124105011933 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0214797136038 0.0406280797675 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73949518478 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0381861575179 0.030933414821 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00477326968974 0.0016655270985 287% => OK
Determiners: 0.126491646778 0.0997080785238 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0167064439141 0.0249443105267 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00954653937947 0.0148568991511 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2187.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 385.0 452.878318584 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68051948052 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.272727272727 0.366273622748 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.202597402597 0.280924506359 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153246753247 0.200843997647 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103896103896 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73949518478 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 59.1616032033 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2631578947 23.380412469 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9639505268 59.4972553346 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.105263158 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 23.380412469 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 40.5228981545 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.77659574468 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355787135442 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0890488402834 0.123202303941 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0528739560233 0.077325440228 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.551545896597 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140304652925 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123848315036 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125660861909 0.0892212321368 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.242050580924 0.385218514788 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0817240451079 0.0692045440612 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232561194101 0.275328986314 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148903838509 0.0653680567796 228% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 4.0 13.5995575221 29% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.