Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Researches tend to improve the life of human beings in one way or the other. I, agree with the claim, that researchers should carry out their study even in the those fields where immediate practical application of their discoveries is not possible. Researches are basically classified into two categories - basic research and applied research. Basic research aims at welfare of people by enhancing the existing scientific discoveries, while applied research is mainly focused on addressing the immediate problems of the society. Although outcomes are uncertain, scientists do have basic insights, whether their work is going to fetch the desired results. Let me elaborate my views in detail, that would strengthen the claim, but weaken the reason.
In today's world population is growing at a rapid pace, and natural resources are on the brink of exhaustion. It is inevitable for us to find a place other than earth where the breed of humans can continue. In the wake of this unavoidable situation, scientists are meticulously studying the characteristics of planets like Mars, since many decades. Even if it is found that life can flourish on Mars, people cannot be directly sent to an imaginary place. Few more years might be consumed in observing the progress of life on another planet. The point here to focus on is, many useful discoveries need ample amount of time before their practical application.
World has always been hit with a lot of deadly epidemics since the early ages. For example, small pox was rampant in 19th century. People in many countries, especially the underdeveloped ones bore the brunt of this deadly disease. At that time there was an immediate need to address this grave concern. Scientists from many nations pulled up their socks to study the characteristics of the virus that caused small pox, and succeeded in inventing a vaccine that almost eradicated the disease within few years. When the scientists undertook this challenge of finding a remedy to small pox, there must have been some level of certainty of getting the positive results. If the outcomes are totally uncertain, no government would fund the scientific studies and progress would come to a halt.
To recapitulate, scientists should definitely study the areas of research where they think that immediate application of the inventions would not be possible. However, I would disagree with the reason cited to justify the claim, because scientists are clever enough to predict certainty of the desired results, though to a small extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | z.salahshoor | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | luciano.pisa | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | p30kh40 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | p30kh40 | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | sanket007 | 66 | view |
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inly focused on addressing the immediate problems of the society. Although outcom...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241758241758 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.162637362637 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0945054945055 0.0880659088768 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0395604395604 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0285714285714 0.0444667217837 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134065934066 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0417582417582 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80249323439 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285714285714 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0043956043956 0.0016655270985 264% => OK
Determiners: 0.107692307692 0.0997080785238 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263736263736 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131868131868 0.0148568991511 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2543.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 412.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17233009709 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366504854369 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28640776699 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.218446601942 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152912621359 0.132149295362 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80249323439 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 219.290929204 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570388349515 0.48968727796 116% => OK
Word variations: 67.5369989026 55.4138127331 122% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.619047619 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3615220973 59.4972553346 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.095238095 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 48.2598243181 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.80952380952 1.64882698954 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428391810373 0.391690518653 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0740440524303 0.123202303941 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0624698060106 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.487091312379 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142997853449 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153227292599 0.161403998019 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820544807308 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427654818193 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0263808725604 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317533283738 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574668402592 0.0653680567796 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.