Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The speaker make a threshold claim that critical judgement of work in any field of study has less value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. I strongly concede with the speaker assertion that without firm decision in any field doesn't provide viable reasoning and understanding for the different subject matters and may lead to the failure.
Turning first to the speaker threshold claim, without proper judgement and understanding of the different field of study doesn't lead to beneficial output. For instance, for the development of transportation and upgrading its salient features, the role of expertise is optimum. Without their precise decision, the absolute development of that field may be halted. Thus, only tracing various developmental plans through the decision of laypersons mayn't provide prosperous results. Therefore, different procedures and understanding methods should compassed from the experts before laying the foundations of various developmental outputs.
Turning to the second place, biasing the critical judgement laid by the expertise and trusting only up on the dabbler personals may foreclose different social judgments of the society. For instance, in any society, numerous judicial reforms regarding social equity shouldn't be performed only getting ideas from the local dwellers. Therefore, to provide justifiable judiciary reforms and justice to all the people of the society, the verdict from the experts of legal system should be taken so that each individual of the society may gets equal justice and reforms. Hence, before providing various critical civic decisions and reforms,the role of specified personnel is must.
Some may argue that critical judgment in various fields should be not only taken from experts, but also should be taken from the experienced personnel from the society. For instance, the information regarding the different social matters just like clean drinking water, road development programs and various others socially related problems are well known by the people of the society rather than the governing bodies. Thus, at such cases, the role of them is quite acute. However, this point is flawed since without gaining firmed and justifiable reports from the expertise,the sustainable and truthful study of the current matters may not be resolved. So, in such condition, the necessity of expertise is the must.
All in all if the above factors are contemplated we can easily reach a conclusion that without considering the proper and acute judgment from the experts, the solution of any problems will not be solved. Therefore, to achieve better result of any problems the proper and critical judgment from the heady people is needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 58
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
The speaker make a threshold claim that critical judgeme...
^^^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that without firm decision in any field doesnt provide viable reasoning and understand...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tanding of the different field of study doesnt lead to beneficial output. For instance...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...udicial reforms regarding social equity shouldnt be performed only getting ideas from th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ous critical civic decisions and reforms,the role of specified personnel is must. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...specified personnel is must. Some may argue that critical judgment in various field...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 575, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d justifiable reports from the expertise,the sustainable and truthful study of the c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45734597156 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76117604013 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502369668246 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0500869782 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.944444444 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271509909725 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852914591497 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136417012186 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171404232242 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135029484024 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.