Students should have the freedom to choose, and explore fields of study that are appealing to them. Thus, the role of educational institutions is to train students in fields of their choice, and not actively encourage them to choose fields on the basis of opportunities at lucrative careers. The reasons for these views are as follows: having a lucrative career depends on the individual, and not the field of study; also, changes in government policies and economic stability may render these so called lucrative jobs unavailable.
First, and foremost, such a statement creates the notion that some fields of study do not lead students to lucrative careers. Having a successful career depends on the student, what the student makes of the field, and how the student effectively applies learning in the classroom to the real world. There are numerous lucrative areas available within any field of study. For instance, in Nigerian universities, there is a cachet placed on courses like medicine, engineering, and law. However, agricultural students are viewed ludicrously, but many of them are able to start lucrative poultry, and fish rearing businesses before their counterparts get jobs.
Furthermore, the continuous availability of these so called lucrative jobs or careers in particular fields of study is not certain. Changes in government policies and economic stability may reduce the presence of these jobs. For example, the effect of the economic recession in countries like Greece, and Portugal has been a lack of jobs, even high paying jobs. In addition, in the Nigerian banking sector, the apex bank implemented a recapitalization policy for banks, these lead to bankers taking pay-cuts and in other cases been let go. Thus, a banking sector once considered lucrative is now less benign.
Opponents against my idea argue that educators are helping students make the right decisions for their future careers. However, students should make the decision of what kind of career paths or options they plan to take; if they fancy careers in academic research or want to be lawyers that take pro bono cases or work in the oil industry, it is their choice, a career choice should be one were an individual feels fulfilled.
Conclusively, lucrative opportunities are inherent in all fields of study, educators should help students meet their aspirations and not advice them to take particular fields of study because the chances at lucrative careers in such areas are apparent.
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 79
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 58
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in particular', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275167785235 0.240241500013 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.140939597315 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.089485458613 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492170022371 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0290827740492 0.0444667217837 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118568232662 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0290827740492 0.0406280797675 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82121142852 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246085011186 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.089485458613 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0134228187919 0.0249443105267 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0111856823266 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2488.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 399.0 452.878318584 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23558897243 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.413533834586 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305764411028 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228070175439 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82121142852 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 58.8250238818 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9375 23.380412469 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3770016424 59.4972553346 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 23.380412469 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.674092028746 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 55.5139411028 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.92857142857 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448759010416 0.391690518653 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121967175997 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0804988606718 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.568012419909 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197125497431 0.149214159877 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189891872694 0.161403998019 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985665004965 0.0892212321368 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347052525822 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.146129212319 0.0692045440612 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31197245955 0.275328986314 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632894677884 0.0653680567796 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.