Essay topics: Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented
No one gainsays that to select a good political leadership is important to develop a nation and a society. Indisputably, some individuals argue that it is desirable for the leaders to be less engaged in the public hearing or open communication for the efficiency of the governing process. However, not everyone agrees such idea. In some cases, having a close connection with the public, a national leader can make many positive impacts on the society.
First and foremost, there are some advantages from non-democratic approach in governmental leadership. To be specific, not concerning with public opinions can benefit the efficiency in law legislation and implementation, as it causes a lot of time and effort to reach the agreement in the public. Among people, there are a variety of different ideas, concepts, and oppinions. It will be extremely challenging to draw the concurment among such diverse people. On the contrary, authoritarian leadership can be efficient to determine the solution when it comes to emergency situations. For example, in a war, this kind of leadership can outperform those who always care for others and delay the decision until the public makes agreement. Therefore, public-opinionated policy can be hazardous to the national development and policy-making.
However, what was allued to above cannot be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with those negatives, listening to public opinions certainly contains a number of benefits. Firstly, democratic leadership can reflect various viewpoints from others which the leader might have overlooked at but are equally or more important than the original proposal. This approach can be more comprehensive and inclusive to all people, and therefore people will less complain about it. In addition, as everyone is contend with the governmental policy with their opinion contributed and considered, they will feel happy and willing to follow the leadership. There are more likely to be peace and social rest, which then benefit the stability of governmental leadership. As seen in these examples, the democratic approach can be advantageous for policy-making and national security.
In addition, public contribution to the governmenta policy can generate beneficial by-products. In this way, the political leadership is less likely to fall in corrupted behaviors, such as bribery, embezzlement, or other illegal activities. People are always concerned with political leaders, and therefore the leaders are prone to be consciencious with their mindset and demeanors, because people and the media are watching him or her.
Based on above discussion, there is no denying the fact that democratic leardership may be harmful to efficiency in policy-making and governmental act in the emergency. However, not always is it ineffectvive. There are certainly cases that the democratic style benefits the society, in terms of making comprehensive and inclusive policy to satisty most citizens and making them feel more happy with a nation as well as reducing the leadership corruption. Therefore, we should aim to build up democratic society where citizens are actively involved in communication with the rulers and policy makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 60
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children’s schools. 54
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 16
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 58
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drawing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: drawing
...nions. It will be extremely challenging to draw the concurment among such diverse peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'makes'' or 'make's'?
Suggestion: makes'; make's
...and delay the decision until the public makes agreement. Therefore, public-opinionate...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contended'.
Suggestion: contended
...n about it. In addition, as everyone is contend with the governmental policy with their...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 183, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
...ntal act in the emergency. However, not always is it ineffectvive. There are certainly ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, as well as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54175152749 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23004882197 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503054989817 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8456180225 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.84 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.64 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.32 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178415387653 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525720982296 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427379707356 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112232463627 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478236423591 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.