Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Free university education is beneficial for those who have economic problem and people with low economic level and make them to utilize universities as the same of other students. Class differences can not be a factor for people with higher intelligence and lower income from continuing education. Financial aid, grant and even scholarships in universities can encourage students and make a better motivation for continuing their education without of any stress. Free university education have a key role in promotion of the society and even in the creation more literate society. It can flourish people's talent who had grown up in poor family and bad economic situations.
We have to admit that, any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition may not be beneficial for the society. Some governments haven't enough budget for any student who has admitted with economic problems. It might be true that, the population of students who passed an entrance exam are high and most of them are from poor family and great cost should be allocated from government. It may hurt to government's budget. It cannot be denied that free university education may create some special problems, such as: the indifference of people to the budget that the government is allocated for them, financial abuses for those who have afford to pay tuition but they pretend bad situations.
With all that said, students with high intelligence in poor family should be under state supervision. On the other hand, it is highly unjustifiable to say that free university education are sorely help these students for their success and financial aid in the duration of education beside free university education would be more effective. Intelligence students in poor family have a better perception from free tuition and these individuals are more assiduous and more successful than other pupils. Hence, it should be considered that poor students have more needs and need more facilities to be successful. In a society with the government's support on poor students with high intelligence and high assiduous would be success than other society. It is the right of every poor citizen for continueing education utilize government's budget and every government should consider some advantages for education of poor students.
Moreover, free university education for those who cannot afford the tuition has some advantages. It can flourish people's talent and it can help them to be more successful than before. Admittedly a student who had passed the entrance exam with special difficulties better perception from their education duration he/she would be more grateful than another students. It could be imagined that these type of students who admitted but cannot afford tuition have more tolerance under economic pressure and make a better society. Every students with any class differences would be able to continue education and make a better future for him/herself.
Consequently, any government with any situation should consider some facilities for education. To this aim that every person utilize university without of any stress for their economic problems. As a result helping poor admitted students in universities can create more grateful society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...icial for the society. Some governments havent enough budget for any student who has a...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ent. It may hurt to governments budget. It cannot be denied that free university e...
^^
Line 2, column 667, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'afforded'.
Suggestion: afforded
...em, financial abuses for those who have afford to pay tuition but they pretend bad sit...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...at free university education are sorely help these students for their success and fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...any stress for their economic problems. As a result helping poor admitted students...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 40.0 12.9106741573 310% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2741.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30174081238 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8221397753 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.359767891683 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.0 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1255942644 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.208333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5416666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412292682905 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149620161999 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118508257473 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281261506189 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879891644985 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.