In modern society, university education is regarded as increasingly important for people \'s career and future success, making more students eagering to getting in to it. This also natually led to the problem of funding for some families. Some people contend that governments should offer free university education for all those who have been admitted but cannot afford the costs. I partly agree with the statement, which ensures equal rignts for everyone to receive education. However, this can also lead to problems like budgets and discrimination.
Foremost, one of the tasks of modern government is to make sure that important social resources are not restricted to certain social classes, including eduction. In fact, equal right to receive education is one of the many characteristics of a modern society. This is also why many countries, including China, is making primary and middle school education free for every citizen. And this can be readily applied to higher education. When the rights to attend universities is marred by the inequality in fortune, it is definitely the time for the government to stand out. If this was not the case, then education would be the prerogative of the rich and the powerful.
What is more, attending a university could be a life-changing opportunities for many, especially those from impecunious families. Letting poorer students study in universities also benefits society as a whole. University education makes its graduates better prepared for more lucrative jobs, which can narrow the gap between the rich and the poor and can falicitate social mobility, on condition that they share the same opportunity to study in a university campus. Although the outcome in eliminating poverty is almost indiscernible in short term, but this endeavor undoubtably making the future of poorer youngsters more competitive and more prosperous in the long-run.
Nonetheless, unconditionally supporting all the students who cannot afford the tuition at universities can also lead to a wealth of problems. For instance, the tuition in America universities is so high that it would be a heavy burden on the budget for governments. Imaginably, this could lead to dissatisfaction among richer tax-payers, further deepening discrimination and misunderstanding between the rich and the poor. In addition, as the expenditure for universities surges, they may increase the tuition fee for international students, which could result in losing some of the brightest brains in the world.
Due to aforementioned ground, patronizing poorer students for their university education is absolutely a responsibility for governments, but providing help for any student who could not afford the tuition could lead to undesired consequences both in universities and in society.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 76
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth i 62
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47685185185 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19158151365 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5447691942 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280025032218 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863066393155 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909271112237 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178261531204 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681191101606 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.