The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people hold the view that the human intellect will always be superior to machines as machines are created by humans, while other people are worried about the threat machines pose to human beings because the development of machines enable them to master thinking ability. From my point of view, I fully agree with the former opinion, as machines are created and also can be controlled by humans.
Admittedly, machines are getting more and more wise in past several decades, especially after the new theory of machine learning is developed. For example, Deep Mind, which is a subsidiary of Google, invented a deep learning system called Alpha Go, which has the ability to “learn” things on its own. The Alpha Go defeated the world’s most famous go player in a 5 round go games, and people were shocked by the “thinking” ability of the system. It can learn how to play the go through delving the past go games. Thus, many people think that machines may dominate the world over humans someday.
However, while it is true that machines are evolving into more intelligent ones, people shall not forget it is humans who develop these machines. The softwares and hardwares machines rely on are developed by engineers. As humans have the ability to create these machines, they certainly can destroy machines. For example, to limit the evolution of machines, engineers can set some software switches in advance and trigger them in case machines evolve too fast. Thus, humans can not only reap the benefits of machines but also control their intellect.
In addition, except the switches which can be set in softwares, more detailed restrictions should be enacted to articulate the confine of developing machines. The regulations should focus on the ultimate limitations a machine need to follow. With the precise definition of the limitations, tech companies can follow these limitations to create machines and prevent them from evolving to creatures which condescend human beings’ intellect.
In sum, as long as humans impose specific regulations on the advancement of machines and follow such regulations strictly, the threat machines will pose to humans can be properly controlled and human mind will always be more sophisticated than machines.
- TPO 2 3
- TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings att 73
- The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends and lifestyles:"People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar, since aspartame can actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. For exam 80
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rictions should be enacted to articulate the confine of developing machines. The ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269503546099 0.240241500013 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.160756501182 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0685579196217 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0543735224586 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0260047281324 0.0444667217837 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113475177305 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0378250591017 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85143816919 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0283687943262 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0827423167849 0.0997080785238 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0354609929078 0.0249443105267 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0141843971631 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2281.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 366.0 452.878318584 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23224043716 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407103825137 0.366273622748 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306010928962 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229508196721 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125683060109 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85143816919 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 57.788359165 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 22.875 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5917434557 59.4972553346 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5625 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 53.4760928962 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.74509803922 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470369338802 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139946871668 0.123202303941 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0940849659853 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.603133608534 0.547984918172 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167415601795 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201713941794 0.161403998019 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798779416155 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.3260919397 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0166044470178 0.0692045440612 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325743861266 0.275328986314 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474914681095 0.0653680567796 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.