It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The conception of people drawing inspirations from their heros are from time immemorial. These heros can be both alive or dead personalities. But as the extent of media coverage is booming exponentially, we tend to know more about the people we consider our heroes. This includes not only the achievements from which we draw inspiration but also about their negative traits. Nevertheless, this nature of media cannot stop us from considering living man or woman as heros, because it is upon the person's attitude which determines his conception of a hero.
Today, with the advent of satellite communication, we are able to gather news from all over the world right by sitting in our homes. This advancement in technology has helped us know more about our celebrities and their scandals like never before. It may definitely seem very likely as more scandals about the celebrities are exposed, people will stop revering as their heros. On the contrary, it is not true because as a matter of fact, no one in this universe is absolutely perfect. Hence, if we take this into account, each person will have some or the other negative trait. Hence, it is upon us whether to overlook the negative traits or consider them. A simple example to illustrate this would Mahatma Gandhi. Mahatma Gandhi today is revered all over the world because of his exceptional non-violent ideology. Numerous people try to imitate his personality. However, if we look at the darker side of Mahatma Gandhi, there are several rumours which suggest that this great personality induldged in sleeping with young women. This being a very serious allegation about such a great personality never stopped people from drawing inspirations from him. Rather, we choose to ignore this and rather draw inspiration from his positive traits.
However, there are instances as well in which media played a signifact role in destroying the personality of emminent persons. Recently, a very famous footballer was convicted for indulding in having sexual intercourse with an underaged teenage girl. This exposure of scandal by the media caused a signifact havoc among the public and moreover many people, who revered him as god, have started despising him.
In a conclusion, it cannot be said for sure that the media stops people from considering living men and women as heroes, but it definitely has a significant impact on a person. However, the ultimately decision lies upon the person whether to consider a living personality as their legend or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... woman as heros, because it is upon the persons attitude which determines his conceptio...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'well', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220524017467 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.148471615721 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0742358078603 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0676855895197 0.0497285424764 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0698689956332 0.0444667217837 157% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.144104803493 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0436681222707 0.0406280797675 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77210208101 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0152838427948 0.030933414821 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106986899563 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0152838427948 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0109170305677 0.0148568991511 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2511.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 413.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0799031477 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375302663438 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271186440678 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186440677966 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118644067797 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77210208101 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537530266344 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 61.409116872 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7727272727 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0343041334 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.136363636 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 45.8913713405 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.42748091603 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322296915357 0.391690518653 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0852548855246 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.061132485161 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.420783001277 0.547984918172 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140436244153 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110147930068 0.161403998019 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591441413111 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.30720360816 0.385218514788 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113776363326 0.0692045440612 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229698258943 0.275328986314 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348448735221 0.0653680567796 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.