It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Society has immensely effect on building characterizes of a person. Form the childhood, our life is influenced by the incident happened in our surrounding. It is people’s mentality to choose similar people, like similar ethnic group and similar characteristics peoples. In our daily lives, we can connect better with those peoples who have been come from similar background and those who have a similar topic to discuss.
So, that's why we able to find similar characterizes peoples from same ethnic group. I am agreed with the statement that a person's identification can be made by their social groups.
From the childhood, society influenced a child’s characteristics and a child learns from their parents and from neighborhood. After that when a child go to school or college choice of friends deeply influenced him or her and they grouped together and developed a thinking like-wise.
After graduate from college or joining a job, we know that, there are different unions for different designation workers. Clarks and officers move with their own kind of groups. We can notice different ideology win different political groups. Similar thinking peoples or similar ideology believed peoples made a political party.
In the conclusion, humans are socializing creature and our social groups enormously affect our characteristics and we can identify a person’s behavior from their social groups or with whom they are connect. Peoples can argue that in this modern era, we connect with different peoples and even with different countries peoples and they can be all different.
But still it is rare to find those kinds of peoples. Peoples can easily connect with them, who are from like-minded background.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | skylarzjy | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
- Men and women , because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 66
- Essay topics: "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associat 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has beenadmitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 5, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... have a similar topic to discuss. So, thats why we able to find similar characteriz...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
.... I am agreed with the statement that a persons identification can be made by their soc...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 204, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'connected'.
Suggestion: connected
...eir social groups or with whom they are connect. Peoples can argue that in this modern ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 272.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36764705882 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99465173498 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9474606351 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6875 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211717837085 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725245810131 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796162850195 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118819326797 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882839415478 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.