The statement raises a problem about the flexibility of the Law, which is also the concentration of law experts and the ordinary public. From my perspective, I believe that law should be flexible enough while the flexibility makes no harm to the law's authority.
It makes sense to urge the flexibility of the law, and the reason lies in the fact that the law cannot cover all the situation in the real world. For example, if someone on the street is dying of a heart attack and a kind driver pick him up and break the traffic rule in order to get him to the hospital in the shortest time. In this case, most people would hold the argument that the driver should not be punished for breaking the traffic rule since life are far important than rules. Another example is the behavior of the grey zone in the real world, which do not break the current law yet produce the negative effect on the society and the individual. The rape whose victim is male, for instance, cannot be accused of any crime in China, whereas this conduct would cause huge damage to the victims' mental health. In this way, the laws are also supposed to be flexible in order to punish those vice and bring justice to the victim.
Nevertheless, the unstable laws can also cause a series of questions. According to the social contract theory, the government is obligated to maintain the stability of the society. The frequent change of the law, however, brings the chaos and the unrest of the whole society. Additionally, the changeable laws would enable villains to make use of the laws for their own profits. Therefore, any item of the laws should be formulated and implemented after deep consideration and discussion of the experts and representatives from various aspects of the society to make it suitable for the society. This, at the same time, means the boring and trivial procedure of any change of formulation of the law, which justifies the necessity of the laws stability and ensures laws' practicability and authority.
Finally, those properties of laws do not have to conflict. For those rules and crime which is of low effect on the society and individual, we could take the real situation into account and make a flexible judgment. we should be cautious, however, to any modulation of laws which could have a great impact on the whole society.
To wrap it up, at the first glance, it could be hard to choose my position, especially when complicated situations in the real world are taken into consideration. However, after deep contemplation, I claim that the law should be adjustable for those minor behaviors yet remain authority to those disciplines causing great influence to the society.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 66
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 76
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
...le the flexibility makes no harm to the laws authority. It makes sense to urg...
^^^^
Line 9, column 739, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
...w, which justifies the necessity of the laws stability and ensures laws practicabili...
^^^^
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...o account and make a flexible judgment. we should be cautious, however, to any mod...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84233261339 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69479625657 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479481641469 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8497510393 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226844960023 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777407172042 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578797855016 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145764456786 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055851233922 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.