There is no shortage of opinions regarding how specific the laws should be to cover all circumstances, times and places and still continue applicable. While flexible and restricted laws have many strengths and weaknesses, I strongly believe that laws should be as flexible as possible, otherwise they would not stand for a long time. Furthermore, flexible laws make less space for uncovered situations, thus raising legal stability of a country.
First of all, anyone can recognize how long and hard is the process to approve laws by the parliament. Representing differing and most of times antagonist groups of the society, the congressmen always have a lot of political discussion before approving any new or revised legislation. Indeed, the process to fix or update a law in most countries is the same of that needed to approve a new one. Based on that, flexible laws created without focus on very restricted circumstances or places should be preferable to guarantee that they can be in force for years. For example, some private markets are totally exposed to technology evolutions that quickly transform the business environment. Such markets should be ruled by laws that keep itself updated even if a disruptive new technology heavily change the way the companies interact and negotiate.
Secondly, a great level of stability should be assumed for any country's legal framework in order to attract long run investments. In this regard, a set of flexible laws that do not need revision every other year should contribute to make the country competitive in the globalized world. For example, multinational companies use to analyze the labor legal framework of several countries in order to decide where to build new industries. So, flexible laws capturing differing ways of production and interaction between the workers and the companies should benefit any country to receive such industries.
On the other hand, one may argue that flexible and vague laws could be rarely applied and well interpreted, hindering their efficacy. Nevertheless, such claim is flawed, mainly because specific conditions in the application of any law could be covered by infra-legal regulation. Indeed, regulations are usually easer to be created and updated, making them a much better instrument to specify concrete situations and application conditions than the laws.
To sum up, flexible laws are more likely to be in force and updated for a long time, what give countries stability and helps in attracting long-run capital investment. For these reasons I definitely believe that laws should be as flexible as possible.
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write 75
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government c 89
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
- GRE Issue:Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
... parliament. Representing differing and most of times antagonist groups of the society, the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...d. For example, multinational companies use to analyze the labor legal framework of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29567307692 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93212380209 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545673076923 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7933845046 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.388888889 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163957738054 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616570453707 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428638296624 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10644135642 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335513481605 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.