In this era, men and women equally are capable of handling any task or working any job despite difference in their physical traits. I do not consider the statement as correct, since I see no logic in differentiating present day tasks on the basis of physical differences. Starting from being astronauts to aerobics trainers or ballet dancers or even nannies, any kind of task cannot be categorised as a gender-specific job.
We belong to a time where our daily lives are heavily influenced by technological means, and the reason why I mention this is because, work these days require a minimal amount of technical means where we accomplish most tasks with the help of gadgets, or electronic devices. Say for example, computer engineers' and data analysts' works heavily depend on working with computers and many other operating system oriented machineries, which do not bother about the physical difference ascribed in their operators. Not only tasks of machine operators, but also outdoor field works including zoologists, wildlife photographers and animal trainers do not necessarily require a man to do the jobs. Women are equally compatible in succesfully accomplishing any task just as well as men can do.
We cannot deny that men and woman have basic differences in their physiques, structures that can play a significant role in distinguishing one from another, for instance, common men are stronger than women. This allows for men to be associated with tasks involving heavy physical force and stronger stamina, like wrestling, or government armed forces. But that doesn't particularly imply that women are absolutely incapable or unsuited for the job. Many women are earning names by being heavyweight champions, or by gaining superior positions in government's tak forces, despite the physical differences, so they should not be lmited to the consideration of not being equally suited for the work at all. Whereas, men who are generally rendered as humans of the gender not as possessed with motherly instincts as the other, have refuted the common belief by being as motherly nannies as a woman can be to children.
Therefore, the idea that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks, because of their visibly or non-visibly present physical characteristics, is not a completely valid case. I conclude that men and women, are compatible of many tasks, if not most of them, equally although having very different physical traits.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company,"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen- produced movies than 42
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 75
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 16
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the 43
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...eans, and the reason why I mention this is because, work these days require a minimal amou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and stronger stamina, like wrestling, or government armed forces. But that doesnt...
^^
Line 6, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., or government armed forces. But that doesnt particularly imply that women are absol...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 827, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th motherly instincts as the other, have refuted the common belief by being as mo...
^^
Line 8, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...men and women are not equally suited for many tasks, because of their visibly or...
^^
Line 8, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d women are not equally suited for many tasks, because of their visibly or non-v...
^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal characteristics, is not a completely valid case. I conclude that men and wome...
^^
Line 8, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lid case. I conclude that men and women, are compatible of many tasks, if not mos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20202020202 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96145268748 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8461527248 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376049411087 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137323888504 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123307291259 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256344463562 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159424674227 0.0667264976115 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.