In ancient times, women were restricted to household works and were not allowed to have a say in their own life. But, with the modernization of the world, many women started taking up jobs and going against the age old patriachy that stopped them from progressing. I mostly disagree that men and women because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. I disagree for the follwoing few reasons stated below.
Men and women physical abilities and not equal and this plays and important factor in the field of military. In many countries, women officers and soldiers are not allowed for combat roles. The main reason cited for this step is that, if a female soldier is being captured by the enemy forces she can be subjected to sexual torture. Countries including USA, Russia, India and many more even though have opened combat opportunities in the airforce, certain combat roles for women in the army are still being considered and yet to be implemented.
However, in the past century women were not considered for a leadership role in the field of politics. There were hardly any female heads of the state. But, gradually many women have fought their way up to the apex and have been elected as the President or Prime Minister of their state. Examples like Angela Merkel, Indira Gandhi, Sheikh Hasina and many more contested elections against their male counterparts, won and have successfully led their countries to great achievements.
The trend has seen a rather unusual increase in the number of female politicians in the world in the past decade and it would not be presumptous to say that women are working on par with their male politicians and leading from the front.
Moreover, in the field of Space Exploration it was considered that women could not withstand the gravitational force exerted on the human body along with not able to withstand the mental pressure and were restrained from going in to space exploration missions. But, female astronauts like Kalpana Chawla, Sunita Williams and many more displayed the women strength and their integrity is not any less than their male counterparts and that gender should not be a deciding factor for the mission. They have manifested that with knowledge and training it is possible to achieve any goal regardless the gender, and thus paved the way for many more women to join their ranks.
Some professions in which physical abilities are a deciding factor may yet not be ready for women. But after analyzing and weighing the pros and cons today's women are certainly paving their way for more tasks that were considered as a male oriented. But, it would not be long before make barriers and broken and women stand equally with men and do the jobs together.
- People work more productively in teams than individually Teamwork requires cooperation which motivates people much more than individual competition does 66
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 80
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 50
- Some people think that having set retirement age e g 65 Years for everybody regardless of occupation is unfair They believe that certain workers desire to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age 58
- The director of the International Health Foundation recently released this announcement quot A new medical test that allows the early detection of a particular disease will prevent the deaths of people all over the world who would otherwise die from the 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...counterparts, won and have successfully lead their countries to great achievements. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93013100437 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55063704166 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8313960652 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.842105263 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52631578947 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388496799595 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130873942384 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129827672745 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203459366404 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969758970845 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.