in most societies competition generally has more of a negative effective effect than a positive effect
Competition has become a more essential part of human society. It has both positive and negative effects. However, the effects of competitions are generally many advantages by which societies can benefit more. Assert given above seems untenable, which can be proved through many examples.
First and foremost, many people think that having competition in human society can be benefited them better. People may restrict themselves in their perspectives about an issue. The competition will help them to think differently and reveal many different sides of the issue and get more information about the issue. For instance, an international world conference conducted for the doctors to help them to share their knowledge between their contemporaries, they have gained over the years. However, there can be huge competition between them, but sharing their knowledge will help them to earn many benefits. So having competitions have positive effects than negative.
Secondly, many folks strongly believe that they can only perform better if there is heavy competition. For example, students these days do group and combined studies during their exams and competition. It does not only help them to look into different points but, also helps them to motivate themselves to perform better in the competitions. Additionally, doing their studies alone will not surely give them better results. Hence, there are more positive results of the competition in society than the negative.
Last but not least, other people believe that competitions can create many negative effects than positive ones. For example, during a competition, some students develop fear and complex about their abilities and get anxious about the results, even some parents and teachers compare these students with their peers. Which can weaken their ability of critical thinking. Though, teachers and parents can help them to face competitions by not comparing them with their friends and can develop a positive environment to face competitions.
To sum up, I concur that competitions always have a positive effect on societies. It has many advantages than having disadvantages. It not only helps people to think critically about the problems but also shows the different approaches to solving a single problem. Hence competitions generally more positive effects.
- People work more productively in teams than individually Teamwork requires cooperation which motivates people much more than individual competition does 83
- in most societies competition generally has more of a negative effective effect than a positive effect 50
- 68
- College students and people in general prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisions Therefore colleges should eliminate as many choices as possible in order to offer students clear direction 55
- The best way to learn a new subject or skill is to study small segments or details in great depth rather than to start by trying to develop a sense of the whole 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lp them to think differently and reveal many different sides of the issue and get more informa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ompare these students with their peers. Which can weaken their ability of critical th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...approaches to solving a single problem. Hence competitions generally more positive ef...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, even so, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4930362117 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80739319252 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495821727019 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1250725712 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7391304348 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6086956522 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04347826087 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254024332491 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102204107929 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127578719386 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179819987257 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847937836215 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.