The school curriculum is the basic building block of knowledge for students entering college. What the students have learned and imbibed in their schools helps the students in understanding the concepts in the college courses. But there is a difference in what all the students learn at the school level because of the different curricuums adopted by the schools. So we need to circumspect whether we need all the students to study the same national curriculum before entering college.
Having a uniform school curriculum will ensure that all the students have a similar level of previous understanding and the coollege curriculum can be decided on basis of that knowledge. It will be universities to decide which students to admit based on their scores as everyone has been tested for the same knowlege. Though this might seem a logical path, but we need to look at the biggger picture.
All the students in a country are not open to same resources. Some live in the rural areas where they may not have amenities and labs like those found in the city schools. Also in a multilingual country like India, it is difficult to fix upon one language of learning. Understanding and learning in some other language is not the same as learning in one's own mother tongue.
Diffferent school curriculums have diifferent difficulty levels or focus on different aspects. Not all students aspire to become doctors, engineer or academics. There are students who show strong inclination towards sports or music from a very young age. So enforcing the same curriculum for these students won't be fair. Also students with disabilities or speacial needs may not necessarily be able to adapt to the same curriculum.
Therefore, I am of the opinion that though having a same curriculum is a good option, but it is not inclusive of everyone. So a common entrance test to get into college is a better option rather than making the schools follow the same curriculum
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One g 60
- 41 A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent Another study however s
- Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 33
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...iculum for these students wont be fair. Also students with disabilities or speacial ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94207317073 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76984853399 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6775365022 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0555555556 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174667842861 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613713340399 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042878391999 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996023027481 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383106255851 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.