Should nations require all students, from primary to high school, to follow the same national curriculum until college? While the answer, at first, may seem as an obvious yes, I believe that the recommendation is too extreme, and vague to implement. There are diverse range of situations where the claim is too difficult to implement and can be disadvantageous. For example, all schools, located across the vast region of India, cannot provide the same level of curriculum due to lack of resources.
If the national curriculum required all students to study computers I would find it difficult to implement in regions like Kashmir or Leh Ladak where electricity outages are frequent and computers are difficult to procure. This situation would create a disadvantage for students from rural areas; as they would lack sufficient computer knowledge to pass the national exams. Of course, if the national curriculum was simple and only applied for the basic subjects then I would be inclined to follow along with the recommendation.
All schools, whether they have sufficient resources or not, are able to provide simple knowledge of subjects like Mathematics, English, and the Sciences. Therefore, if the national curriculum was extended to only include those basic subjects which do not require large amounts of resources then it would be fruitful to implement the recommendation. Doing so, national level examinations could be carried out and colleges would be able to use the exam results as an admission criteria. However, while implementing the recommendation it would be important to keep in mind that not all fields require the same level of knowledge in a subject. For example, Engineering requires more knowledge of Math and Physics while Medical fields require stronger grasp of Biology.
In the event that the same national curriculum was implemented everyone would study all subjects on the same level. Medical students would be studying Math that might be too difficult for them, or students' who want to become Engineers would be studying Biology when they might require it or even be interested in it. This could lead to lower motivation for some subjects as students would be forced to study subjects which they are not interested in. Of course if the curriculum was split field wise like, Medical students study higher level Biology and lower level Physics, then it could lead to an advantageous scenario. However, if the curriculum was general and all students were to study subjects of the same difficulty level it could lead to an abundance of students becoming demotivated.
In conclusion, as the recommendation stands currently it is too extreme, and vague to accept; therefore, more work needs to be done on the recommendation. However, the concept of having the same national curriculum till high school has merit leading to a future where education equality is possible for all students.
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 68
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service These organizations have a great need for volunteers but in recent years the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined Th 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 66
- In order for any work of art whether film literature sculpture or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 66
- The following appeared in a petition presented by Classen University students to the school s administration The purpose of higher education is to prepare the student for the future but Classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 470.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21489361702 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89373044208 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448936170213 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1509587038 57.8364921388 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.0 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7368421053 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.70786347227 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373556373165 0.218282227539 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131560569119 0.0743258471296 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114947520606 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221599177087 0.128457276422 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598006829474 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.