Often, we assume that elementary level education is enough for anyone to perform simple tasks. Thus, the syllabus is universal for all students until elementary level. So assuming that fixed curriculum might do the same trick is not bad. Nevertheless, this approach can not help students in longer run, because at a point student start figuring out their own interest in different subject right after elementary level education. So it is disavantageous to force student to study a fixed curriculum until college. I disagree with the issue and my reasonsings are mentioned in upcoming text.
Human minds grow and learn best when they are challenged along with difficult situation. Student life before college, also shows this learning graph. Students are tends to change their interest in subjects based on challenges they face, if we do not allow student to switch among their favorite subjects, then we might put a barrier in their growth.
A Nation expects great engineers, doctors, lawyers etc from their country, but sportsman, artist, soldiers are also needed to grow towards a better future. Fixed Curriculum is very outrageous thinking towards liberal minds. Often we see students with more interest in sports rather than chemistry, so they opt for easier subject. This allows them to achieve passing grades easily and fully concentrate on their sports. For example; if we expect focus more and more in mathematics achievement from a student and forgets about his own interest in painting. Then we might end-up with a average mathematician rather than having good artist.
Sometime health issues can be a barrier in a student life. Though, countries are encouraging education for all children regardless of their disabilities, fixed curriculum might put an immense pressure on these children to compete with other children.
Although, fixed curriculum has no gurantee to bring the best talent to college or make better society, it might end up with increment in drop-out rates amoung young teens, who may feel rejected in such pressured conditions.
In the conclusion, I firmly believe fixed curriculum will not help our society and invironment.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to 3
- School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to best', 'to well'
Suggestion: to best; to well
...ing text. Human minds grow and learn best when they are challenged along with di...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best when they are challenged along with difficult situation. Student life before...
^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... in painting. Then we might end-up with a average mathematician rather than havin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30813953488 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71595649566 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5812029582 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157966982367 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531726119947 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385148896112 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737322439158 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405273126723 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.