No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Over the course of evolution, mankind have aggregated the knowledge from various fields to enhance the society we live in. The experience of many fields have contributed to the develpment of various facilities that we enjoy today. The prompt claims that in order for a field of study to advance significantly, it needs to incoporate the experiences and knowlegde of the outside field. I argree with the above argument for two main reasons, which I will elucidate below. But, I do concede that sometimes outside experiences and knowledge can propel the studies in wrong direction.
To begin, it is important to acknowldege the interlink between different studies and to understand the dependence of studies on each other. Like for eg., physics is largely dependent on the knowlegde of mathemathics. Without the experiences and knowledge of the latter, the former would not even had started. The field of aviation or automobile depends upon chemical engineering to understand the principle and working of internal combustion engine, and on aerodynamics to make the vehicle stable. Likely other fields like robotics automations, designing, etc. also plays an important part in the production of the vehicles. Thus, it is fair to conclude that the fields are interconnected and are depended upon each other.
Secondly, it will be difficult for a field to excel without the experiences and knowledge from the field outside. Many a times at appropriate instances historians turns to psychology to explain a certain events. Many instances in the history would have remain ambigious without the help of psychology. The field of neuroscience depends on the field of psychology and biology to explain the working of neurons in the brain. Without the knowledge from other fields, many such fields will become stagnate and not produce any beneficial results. Outside knowledge often boost the development in many such fields. Hence, we can conclude that it is cruzial to incorporate the knowledge and experiences from outside field.
However, I do believe that if the principles of one field is blindly applied on the other, it can result in no development or even worse, negative consequences. Also, it can become difficult to manage knowledge from multiple fields together. With ample of care, such issues can be mitigated. Like for eg., with proper consideration the dangerous nuclear fission reaction is helping human society to solve its energy crisis problem. Thus, I believe that as each coin have two sides, the prompt's claim also have two faces. Such that one face can cause serious problem, while the other can help to solve it.
In conclusion, we can say that the prompt's claim that knowledge and experiences from outside field is necessary for the advancement of the field mostly holds water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | abhikhanna | 50 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans generally 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 54
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o begin, it is important to acknowldege the interlink between different studies and to unders...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'would' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...f the latter, the former would not even had started. The field of aviation or autom...
^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... knowledge from the field outside. Many a times at appropriate instances historians tur...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...urns to psychology to explain a certain events. Many instances in the history would ha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...any instances in the history would have remain ambigious without the help of psycholog...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20575221239 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85330221025 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480088495575 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1192002029 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319001298775 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937553521 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765891065749 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201607846893 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734746809828 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.