In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays we are exposed to various types of media and artistic productions. And it is quite evident that to become renown and for a piece to disseminate through various cultures, a piece of art should be comprehensible. However, even the most absurd and ambiguous creations of an artist may possess great value and it is these pieces that will be remembered through history.
First of all, for an artistic creation to become famous and earn money, it should appeal to the taste of the crowd. Pieces requiring profound knowledge to understand will possibly bore the audience and thus will likely to be overlooked. In addition, especially in the movies and music disciplines, piquant types of creations are likely to stimulate the crowd to watch or listen to their productions. For instance, the public will likely listen to Eminem, instead of Mozart because it entails more enthusiasm and emotions if you are not a trained listener with a profound taste in classics. Also, the fame and profit made the by Avengers show that even though the film is jubilant and the story doesn't contain many twists, the public tend to watch the movie and perceive it as a great pass-time.
Nevertheless, it would be wrong to assert that arts and music that does not catch the attention of the crowd does not contain artistic values inside them. Creators wanting to express themselves and their views may provide productions that may seem recondite to our views. However, it doesn't mean that the artistic quality and ingeniousness doesn't exist. Although it may take time to recognize the true values inherent in these creations, it may someday be admired. For instance, Picasso's portraits of himself seemed abnormal to most people in that era, but his pictures are one of the most praised creations that are held as innovative between contemporary artists. In addition, the famous Van Gogh, who wasn't able to sell one picture during his entire lifetime, now has a museum dedicated to his arts as a representation of reverence. Hence, it would be hasty to argue that any piece of art is not worthy of veneration simply because it is not popular.
Finally, sometimes productions that enjoy popularity sometimes disappear into the oblivion if it actually lacks artistic values. Sometimes there are arts and music that stimulates the public but, by using sensational flavor. However, to be constantly reminisced, an artifact should contain some idiosyncratic quality that others cannot imagine. As an example, although Avengers was highly successful in the market, it is unlikely to be watched over time like the classics or Mozart or Bach. This is because the movie only focused on commercial success and doesn't contain innovative ideas about the movie production process itself.
In conclusion, although fame and commercial success requires a public attention, the lack of popularity does not necessarily mean the failure of the art. Rather, it is the new views of the art itself that makes the creations last.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 62
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 62
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ough the film is jubilant and the story doesnt contain many twists, the public tend to...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eem recondite to our views. However, it doesnt mean that the artistic quality and inge...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the artistic quality and ingeniousness doesnt exist. Although it may take time to rec...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
.... In addition, the famous Van Gogh, who wasnt able to sell one picture during his ent...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... only focused on commercial success and doesnt contain innovative ideas about the movi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08299595142 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73788100446 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506072874494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2117281581 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.136363636 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112911731561 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312733190009 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281251613117 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060046097478 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207596624496 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.