As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
As technology becomes more integrated with our everyday life, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate due to their dependency on technology to problem solve issues. It is true that technology has replaced many components in our everyday life and that humans greatly depend on technology as a means to make decisions for them. Humans since the advent of technology have relied heavily on technology for not just problem solving. Our dependency on technology has reached a sickening level. Humans are gradually displaying less of an ability to problem solve without the dependency of technological tools. It is also very visible that due to the dependency on technology the overall level of creativity has also decreased. One of the scariest scenarios is that all technology is driven by electrical resources, so what will happen when there is no electricity. We will discuss each example in further detail.
With the reliance on technology to make critical decisions for humans, it is clear that humans are losing the ability to provide accurate and effective solutions to real life problems. The loss of this ability can be attributed to the heavily reliance on technology. No longer is the average human master of their own decisions, as technology in many ways has enslaved them with the output of data in problem solving. If a humans we no longer are able to make independent decisions, the outlook is very dim.
The loss in the ability to problem solve our own issues also will directly impact our level of creativity in being able to advance the human species as a whole. The dependency on technology will slow progress and perhaps pullback effort for humans as an entity in advancement on this world. The ability to problem solve and creativity go hand in hand. Every problem, in most cases, is unique and requires new solutions. The ability to present new solutions comes from creativity and with lower levels of creativity to recognize solutions to problems will have an inverse effect on the human race.
Furthermore, most if not all technology relies on electricity as a power source. So what will happen when there is a long duration of electrical outage? With our levels of dependency on technology and the inability to problem solve compounded with lessening levels of creativity will introduce total chaos. While technology is a very resourceful tool to be used in helping us achieve objectives, it is not in our best interest to make technology the focus on making all of our decision. It is a tool to be used, not a key to be relied on. Humans need to be engine in decision making and technology just a component of that engine, not the other way around.
In conclusion, as people rely more on technology to solve problems while demonstrating less of an ability to think for them self is accurate. Humans for the past decades have provided plenty of signals in lacking less of an ability to problem solve issues in real life and have lower levels of confidence towards creativity. The only thing that needs to happen now is for our electric power sources to go down for an extended period of time before all chaos break lose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Analysis of Issue:Formal educational credits should be the most important factor in hiring employees.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the above opinion. Support your opinion with reasons and examples 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 54
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 83
- "The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. " 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a human' or simply 'humans'?
Suggestion: a human; humans
...e output of data in problem solving. If a humans we no longer are able to make independe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an entity in advancement on this world. The ability to problem solve and creativity...
^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'solutions'' or 'solution's'?
Suggestion: solutions'; solution's
...w solutions. The ability to present new solutions comes from creativity and with lower le...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ower sources to go down for an extended period of time before all chaos break lose.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, while, in conclusion, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2645.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88909426987 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75249984142 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421441774492 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4530123464 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.730769231 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8076923077 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26923076923 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365439178678 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107406090795 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972582050925 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210837071682 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081739764511 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.