People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It has long been accepted that decision making should be based on logic instead of emotion. Nevertheless, making decisions based purely on logic is nearly impossible. Therefore, from time to time, we have all been guilty of allowing sentiments to bias our thinking. After awards, some people admit the fact that the decision they made are tinted with sentiment, will others choose to justify their bad decision. Those who justify their emotion based decisions are poor decision maker, not only because they make decisions irrationally, but also because they refuse to learn from past mistakes.
Decision should be make using rational thinking instead of sentiments. Decisions are what affects our future paths, and allowing emotions to bias decisions are simply unreasonable. For example, when deciding whether to accept a favorable job offer, if a person choose not to because he or she had a argument with his or her family last week about her frequent job changes, and as such don not want to give his or her family the chance to criticize him or her, the person is making decision base on emotion rather than reasons. In doing so, the person is giving up an opportunity he or she may never have again in the future. This example shows that allowing sentiments to bias us decision making is deleterious to our lives. Therefore, those who make decisions based on emotion are poor decision maker.
In addition to making decisions base on sentiments, those who justifies those bad decision afterwards using logic are poor decision makers because they refuse to face their mistakes and learn from them. When people try to justify their poor decisions in retrospective, they are basically refusing face mistake. Only by admitting the fact that we erred can we learn from past mistake and improve in the future. Those who justify decisions based on emotions with logic are trying to convincing themselves that what they did are right, so that they can continue on making the same mistake in the future. Even worse, the fact that they try to justify the decision using logic means that they know logic is what decisions should be based on. They are trying to trick themselves. They know how to make to decisions, but they refuse to do so. Making decisions based on emotion and then justify the decisions using logic is a horrendous way of making decision.
In conclusion, people who make decisions base on sentiment and then justify them with rational thinking are poor decision maker because in addition to biased decisions, they also refuse to face the fact they are making biased decision, making it impossible for them to become better decision makers in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 54
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wi 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...om past mistakes. Decision should be make using rational thinking instead of sent...
^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...son choose not to because he or she had a argument with his or her family last we...
^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because in addition to biased decisions, they also refuse to face the fact they a...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219959266802 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.213849287169 0.157235817809 136% => OK
Adjectives: 0.061099796334 0.0880659088768 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0529531568228 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0875763747454 0.0444667217837 197% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.107942973523 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0733197556008 0.0406280797675 180% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.50166783817 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0468431771894 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.0020366598778 0.0016655270985 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.0570264765784 0.0997080785238 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142566191446 0.0249443105267 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0224032586558 0.0148568991511 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2676.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 449.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95991091314 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365256124722 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247216035635 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182628062361 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104677060134 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50166783817 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423162583519 0.48968727796 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.3536675593 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.45 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0724663374 59.4972553346 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.45 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 47.1716035635 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.13218390805 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416437693028 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140708847069 0.123202303941 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.116973084312 0.077325440228 151% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.473924999926 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183266215075 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166662944945 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087374296849 0.0892212321368 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433193097431 0.385218514788 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0836975742161 0.0692045440612 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320061379221 0.275328986314 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368137806555 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.